Understanding Normal Force on an Inclined Frictionless Slope

  • Thread starter Thread starter SecretSnow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing Slope
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the normal force acting on a person on an inclined frictionless slope. Participants are exploring the relationship between the normal force and the components of gravitational force, particularly in the context of motion along the slope.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the relationship between the normal force and the gravitational force components, particularly in the context of acceleration down the slope. There is discussion about the coordinate system used to analyze the forces acting on the person on the slope.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the coordinate system and the implications of motion on the normal force. Some participants are clarifying their understanding of the axes and how they relate to the forces involved, while others are reflecting on the implications of these definitions.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions regarding the direction of forces and motion, particularly whether the normal force can be equated to the y-component of weight when the person is sliding down the slope.

SecretSnow
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm very confused by a slope question...I've read that for a person with mass m on an inclined frictionless slope, it's normal force perpendicular to the surface is always equal to the y-component of the weight. Why? I'm always thinking that since the person slides down, he can also be accelerating downwards which means there's a net resultant y-component force? Or is that impossible because at any point the net y force should be zero? Why then? Is that an assumption that the person never accelerate downwards? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there is confusion about the coordinates system. Since something perpendicular to the surface, is on the y-axis direction, then the coordinates system x,y is the one that x-axis is parallel to the slope and y-axis perpendicular to it. I think that you considered that the coordinates system is the one where the y-axis is in the direction of gravity field, but this is not the case. Anyway, it doesn't matter what coordinates system you use in order to analyze the problem; actually there is no need to set a coordinates system. Just draw all the forces acting on the body, considering that the gravity force component that is perpendicular to the slope, is equal to the normal force. This should happen in order to remain always on the slope because if the perpendicular forces didn't cancel each other, then there would be perpendicular displacement.
 
Actually, is going down the slope (a displacement in y-distance) relevant to the question? Meaning if there's no y-velocity or force how can it travel in the y-axis direction?
 
SecretSnow said:
Actually, is going down the slope (a displacement in y-distance) relevant to the question? Meaning if there's no y-velocity or force how can it travel in the y-axis direction?
You're defining the y-axis as parallel to the slope? If so, the normal force is along the x-axis, and will be the x-component of g. If not, please clarify your axes.
 
I took my axes with x parallel to the slope surface. Even if I took the x to be entirely horizontal and a vertical y axis, the ball will still be descending in y right? Thanks!
 
SecretSnow said:
I took my axes with x parallel to the slope surface.
Then I'll interpret your OP in that light:
since the person slides down, he can also be accelerating downwards which means there's a net resultant y-component force?
Your y direction is normal to the surface. Since the person neither leaps off the surface nor sinks into it, there's no movement in the y direction, so no acceleration in that direction either.
 
haruspex said:
Then I'll interpret your OP in that light:

Your y direction is normal to the surface. Since the person neither leaps off the surface nor sinks into it, there's no movement in the y direction, so no acceleration in that direction either.

Oh I got it already! There is no y gain or decrease because the x-axis is parallel to the slope! Thanks a ton bro!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K