Understanding Parametric Equations: Conflicting Answers Explained

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter phalanx123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of parametric equations, specifically addressing the evaluation of the derivative \(\frac{dy}{dx}\) at \(\theta = 0\). Participants explore conflicting interpretations of the limit and the implications of encountering an indeterminate form.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that substituting \(\theta = 0\) into \(\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{4\sin(4\theta)}{\sin\theta}\) results in an indeterminate form \(\frac{0}{0}\) and presumes this indicates an undefined gradient.
  • Another participant suggests that \(\frac{0}{0}\) does not imply infinity and recommends using L'Hopital's rule or a trigonometric substitution to resolve the limit.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that many trigonometric identities assume \(\sin \theta \neq 0\) and that the transformation effectively evaluates the limit as \(\theta\) approaches zero rather than being exactly zero.
  • Another participant clarifies that \(\frac{0}{0}\) is "undetermined" and asserts that the derivative is not defined at \(x = 0\), but if the limit exists as \(x\) approaches zero, it can yield a defined value, which they confirm as 16 using L'Hopital's rule.
  • One participant challenges the equivalence of infinitesimals and zero, indicating that defining infinitesimals is a complex issue not suitable for undergraduates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the interpretation of the indeterminate form \(\frac{0}{0}\) and its implications for the derivative at \(\theta = 0\). Multiple competing views on how to approach the limit and the definitions involved remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of continuity and differentiability, as well as the assumptions made regarding the behavior of functions near points of indeterminacy.

phalanx123
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
two conflicting answers?

I was doing a question on differentiate parametric equations which has this result [tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{4sin(4\theta)}{sin\theta}[/tex]. it then asks what the value of [tex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/tex]would be if [tex]\theta=0[/tex]. if I substitute [tex]\theta=0[/tex] into [tex]\frac{4sin(4\theta)}{sin\theta}[/tex] than I get [tex]\frac{0}{0}[/tex] which I persume would be infinity, i.e. the grdient of the graph at that point is undefinined. but if I transform [tex]\frac{4sin(4\theta)}{sin\theta}[/tex] into [tex]16cos\theta cos(4\theta)[/tex] and substitute[tex]\theta=0[/tex] in than I got 16 which is the correct answer. How can this be possible?:confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess the simplest answer would be that 0/0 doesn't mean infinity. In your case, it essentially means 'try harder' -- use L'Hopital's rule, or a trig substitution, to solve.
 
Many trig Identities arise from assumptions that the value ie [itex]\sin \theta[/itex] does not equal zero. If you look at the proofs, many involve divisions which are not possible when it equals zero. Basically when you transformed it you worked out the limit as it approaches zero, as you let theta become an infinitesimal instead of exactly zero, which some picky mathematicians may say are equivalent but you get what i mean.
 
No, 0/0 is not "infinity"- it is "undetermined". If you are actually given that dy/dx= sin(4x)/sin(x) then the simple answer is that dy/dx is not defined at x= 0. If however, you are given that the dy/dx= sin(4x)/sin(x) for x not equal to 0 and that dy/dx is defined at x= 0, take the limit of dy/dx as x goes to 0. (Derivatives are not necessarily continuous but the do satisfy the "intermediate value property" and so if the limit exists the derivative must be equal to that limit.) An easy application of L'Hopital's rule gives 16 as the value just as you say.

Gib Z, I don't know any mathematicians, picky or not, who say "infinitesmal is the same as zero". I do know that defining "infinitesmal" is a very picky problem and I would not recommend it to undergraduates.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K