Understanding Perturbation Theory for the Harmonic Oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying perturbation theory to the harmonic oscillator, specifically addressing the energy shifts when the spring constant k is slightly increased. The allowed energies are defined as E_n=(n+1/2)hω, where ω=√(k/m). Participants clarify that the perturbation Hamiltonian H' is the additional term that modifies the original Hamiltonian, leading to a new potential V'(x)=(1/2)(1+ε)kx². The first-order energy correction is expressed as E_n^1=<ψ_n^0|H'|ψ_n^0>, with emphasis on understanding H' without direct integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly harmonic oscillators.
  • Familiarity with perturbation theory and its applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian mechanics and the role of Hamiltonians in quantum systems.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation used in quantum mechanics, including integrals and operators.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" to deepen understanding of perturbation theory.
  • Explore the derivation of first-order energy corrections in quantum systems.
  • Research the implications of varying spring constants in quantum harmonic oscillators.
  • Learn about the mathematical techniques for evaluating matrix elements in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, as well as researchers interested in perturbation theory applications in harmonic oscillators.

JamesJames
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
For the harmonic oscillator V(x) = \frac{1}{2}kx^2, the allowed energies are E_n=(n+1/2)h \omega where \omega = \sqrt{k/m} is the classical frequency. Now suppose the spring constant increases slightly: k -> (1 + \epsilon)k. Calculate the first order perturbation in the energy.

This is 6.2 from Griffith' s book and after this question he gives the following hint although according to me, the hint is more confusing than the question without the hint:

Hint
What is H' here? It is not necessary- in fact it is not permitted - to calculate a single integral in doing this problem.

I understand what the formula looks like..it is
E_n^1 = &lt;\psi_n^0 |H&#039;| \psi_n^0&gt;

but how can this be done without evaluating a single integral? Also what is H' ?

James
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
H' must the perturbation.Namely the small term added to the original hamiltonian and which shifts the energy levels and also the initial quantum states.U need to find that perturbation.

Daniel.

P.S.I think it should be linear term in "epsion"... :rolleyes:
 
The new potential is: V&#039;(x)=\frac{1}{2}(1+\epsilon)kx^2=\frac{1}{2}kx^2+\frac{1}{2}\epsilon kx^2

Therefore the new hamiltonian is:

H=H_0+\frac{1}{2}\epsilon kx^2
where H_0 is the old hamiltonian.

EDIT: Whoops. Forgot the k.
 
Last edited:
\frac{1}{2}\epsilon k x^{2} [/itex]<br /> <br /> if u drop the k (you have no reason to do that),it won&#039;t be that obvious that the perturbation is proportional (and much smaller due to the magnitude of the proportionality constant) to the unperturbed one.<br /> <br /> Daniel.
 
Now just one second...is H' going to affected? It was \sigma \hbar \omega x\hat

I don' t see how this is going to be affected by k changing...\omega contains the \epsilon but \omega itself does not change right? According to me H' must be same :confused:

James
 
Hold on,that's the problem...Find H'...And then see whether it is any different (than what ?? :confused: )

Daniel.
 
E_n^1 = &lt;\phi_n^0 |\sigma \hbar\omega \hat x| \phi_n^0&gt; so according to me just the \omega bit will be affected. I don' t see what else in the expression for E_n^1 could be affected. i.e. the results of the integrals won' t be affected

James
 
From the expression u posted,should i understand that
\hat{H}&#039;=\sigma\hbar\omega\hat{x}

?If so,then who's every symbol of the RHS??

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K