Understanding Riemann Zeta functions for s=1/3

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter joao_pimentel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Riemann
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Riemann Zeta function, specifically evaluating \(\zeta(1/3)\). The standard formula \(\zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^s}\) converges only for Re(s) > 1, making \(\zeta(1/3)\) theoretically divergent. However, using Wolfram Alpha yields an approximate value of -0.9, indicating the need for an alternative approach. The correct formula for evaluating \(\zeta(s)\) in this case is \(\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(s)} \int_0^\infty \frac{x^{s-1}}{e^x - 1} dx\), which is applicable for non-converging values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann Zeta functions
  • Familiarity with complex analysis concepts
  • Knowledge of the Gamma function
  • Basic calculus for evaluating improper integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of the Gamma function and its applications
  • Learn about the analytic continuation of the Riemann Zeta function
  • Study convergence criteria for series and integrals in complex analysis
  • Explore numerical methods for approximating divergent series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying complex analysis, and anyone interested in advanced number theory and the properties of the Riemann Zeta function.

joao_pimentel
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Hi guys

I'm trying to understand Riemann Zeta functions particularly for s=1/3

I know \zeta(s)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{n^s}

and converges for Re(s)>1

Ok, but what about for s=1/3, then

\zeta(1/3)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{n^{1/3}}=<br /> \sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{n}}

Theoretically it should not converge, but when I put \zeta(1/3) on Wolfram I get approximately -0,9

May you kindly explain me this result, please?

________________________

Why? Because I'm trying to solve this problem:
\left[\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{4}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{5}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{6}}+...+\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{1000000}}\right]

where \left[x\right] = is the Greatest Integer function

And I thought Riemann Zeta functions might be the solutions...

Any tips?

Thank a lot in advance guys for your support...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wolfram-Alpha gives that result mainly because the Riemann Zeta Function formula you're using, i.e.

\zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^s}

Only applies when Re(n)>1. Since the number you're using doesn't fit that application, we have to use a different formula, usually this one:

\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(s)} \int_0^\infty \frac{x^{s-1}}{e^x - 1} dx

That formula should give you a solution to Zeta(1/3). But I don't think it'll apply in this problem.
 
ok, thank you so very much for your attention...

I'll continue thinking on the subject...

thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K