Understanding Rotational Inertia: A Homework Challenge

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
14 replies · 3K views
xtrubambinoxpr
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



in Attachment

Homework Equations



I = .5*mr^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea what is going on. This is a pre section quiz and I guessed on one and got it right. I don't know what is meant by the equations not giving I. I googled and noticed I has various equations. I plugged in the one I though most pertinent but it was marked wrong. Someone assist me please!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-10-28 at 11.57.26 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-10-28 at 11.57.26 AM.png
    46.3 KB · Views: 474
  • Screen Shot 2013-10-28 at 11.57.58 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-10-28 at 11.57.58 AM.png
    47.4 KB · Views: 476
Physics news on Phys.org
The moment of inertia, I should be .5*MR^2, not .5*mR^2. See if that helps.
 
johntcmb said:
The moment of inertia, I should be .5*MR^2, not .5*mR^2. See if that helps.

I don't see how. I tried calculating with both m and M but I was wrong both times
 
johntcmb said:
The moment of inertia, I should be .5*MR^2, not .5*mR^2. See if that helps.
The wheel is not stated to be a uniform disc. That is why I is given as an input variable. It cannot be obtained from a formula. But the question setter seems to have forgotten to provide the numerical value of I.
 
haruspex said:
The wheel is not stated to be a uniform disc. That is why I is given as an input variable. It cannot be obtained from a formula. But the question setter seems to have forgotten to provide the numerical value of I.

Are you sure? Lol
Not to insult you but googling it has the same question solved with I not given. And I can figure it out for the life of me :/
 
Since you "guessed" the answer for a correctly, you can substitute that value into eq. 3 and with a little alfebra get T = mg - ma. Using that, you get T = 4.524 N. Plugging I=.5*MR^2 into eq. 4 should give you the same result.
 
I got T=4.6N,a=4m/s2,α(angular acceleration)=16.25rad/s2

I used the equations

mg-T=ma

TR=Iα

a=Rα

Solve these equations you will get the answer
 
nil1996 said:
I got T=4.6N,a=4m/s2,α(angular acceleration)=16.25rad/s2

I used the equations

mg-T=ma

TR=Iα

a=Rα

Solve these equations you will get the answer
There are 6 variables there: m, T, R, a, I, α. You have three equations. Therefore you need the values of three variables. You are told the numerical values of m and R, that's all. You must have used a fourth equation.
 
xtrubambinoxpr said:
Are you sure? Lol
Not to insult you but googling it has the same question solved with I not given. And I can figure it out for the life of me :/
Quite sure. Note that equation (4) has I in the final formula before evaluation, implying you are supposed to substitute a number for I. If you were expected to obtain I from M and R there would be an equation for that somewhere in the text.
If you think you have found somewhere on the net that solves this on the information given, pls post the link.
 
haruspex said:
There are 6 variables there: m, T, R, a, I, α. You have three equations. Therefore you need the values of three variables. You are told the numerical values of m and R, that's all. You must have used a fourth equation.

we also have value of I
I have assumed it to be a thin disc.
 
Last edited:
nil1996 said:
we also have value of I
I have assumed it to be a thin disc.
You are not given that information, nor a formula. Instead, I is given symbolically as an input and also appears in the final equations. This strongly suggests it is not supposed to be a uniform disc, but the numerical value was to be given.
If you read back through the posts you'll see that xtrubambinoxpr tried using your assumption (though once with the wrong mass) and the answer was rejected.
 
haruspex said:
You are not given that information, nor a formula. Instead, I is given symbolically as an input and also appears in the final equations. This strongly suggests it is not supposed to be a uniform disc, but the numerical value was to be given.
If you read back through the posts you'll see that xtrubambinoxpr tried using your assumption (though once with the wrong mass) and the answer was rejected.

But the acceleration looks right
 
haruspex said:
In what way does it 'look right'? I don't see the answer supplied anywhere in the thread.

See in the attachment he has got acceleration right
 
nil1996 said:
See in the attachment he has got acceleration right
Ok, I see. It could be rounding error, i.e. 4 is accepted as close enough.
xtrubambinoxpr, it accepted a=4. Since α = a/R, if a is right then it should be easy to get α right. Similarly, T = mg-ma. What did you enter for α and T?