Understanding Stirling's Formula: The Bent Equals Sign Explained

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PageWizard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the notation used in Stirling's formula, particularly the meaning of the bent equals sign and its implications for approximating factorials. Participants explore the nuances of mathematical symbols related to approximation and asymptotic equality.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Daniel inquires about the bent equals sign in Stirling's formula, seeking clarification on its meaning.
  • Some participants suggest that the bent equals sign indicates "approximately equal," with a focus on how Stirling's formula approximates n! as n increases.
  • Others clarify that the symbol may represent asymptotic equality, explaining that it implies a specific limit condition regarding the ratio of functions.
  • One participant emphasizes that Stirling's formula does not yield n! exactly, but rather an approximation that becomes closer as n grows.
  • There is a disagreement regarding the exact symbol being referenced, with some suggesting it resembles \succ or \prec, while others propose it is \asymp.
  • Participants reference external resources for mathematical symbols, indicating a search for clarity on the notation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the exact meaning of the bent equals sign and its representation in Stirling's formula. There is no consensus on the specific symbol or its implications, leading to multiple competing interpretations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of mathematical notation and the potential for varying interpretations based on context. Participants reference different symbols and their meanings without resolving the ambiguity surrounding the bent equals sign.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying mathematical notation, particularly in the context of approximations and asymptotic analysis, as well as individuals exploring Stirling's formula and its applications in mathematics.

PageWizard
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

My name is Daniel. I have a simple question. I'm just doing some research for my theory and I found myself just in the topic of stirling's formula. It is denoted with an equals sign that is bent in like the top bar of the equals sign in bent down, and the bottom bar of the equals sign is bent up. What is this symbol? (like it looks like = but, is modified). I apologize if this is a simple answer just my book doesn't give the written definition of the formula. Thank you for your time :).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the case of Stirling's formula it means "approximately equal". Stirlings formula gives an approximation of n!, the approximation becoming closer to n! as n gets larger.
 
Perhaps the sign you meant was "~" ?

That sign denotes asymptotic equally, which roughly, as Halls has already said, means that Stirlings formula approximates n!, which the error reducing as n becomes larger.

Formally, if [tex]\lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{A(n)}{B(n)} = 1[/tex], then we state A(n) ~ B(n).

From this we can see that the error does not necessarily reduce as n grows large, but that the ratio of the error becomes small with respect to the size of the function itself.

Eg (x+1) ~ x, but with a constant error of 1.
 
[tex]n!\approx\sqrt{2\pi n} \left( \frac n e \right)^n[/tex]

The [itex]\approx[/itex] means "approximately equal to". In other words, Sterling's formula (better: Sterling's approximation) does not yield n factorial. It does yield something that is fairly close to n factorial.
 
no it's not approximately equal to. It is an equal sign with the top bar bent downwards, and the bottom bar bent upwards. It could in meaning be approximately or precisely equal to but it looks like if you cut a empty half elipse in half, put the bottom half on the top where the topbar of the equal sign was, and the other on the bottom bar.

I can't exactly find the symbol unfortunately.
 
There's a list of mathematical symbols in Latex http://www.csulb.edu/~fnewberg/Research/latexsymbols2.pdf" . Sounds like you're describing [itex]\succ[/itex] or [itex]\prec[/itex] to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to PF!

Hi Daniel! Welcome to PF! :smile:

There's an non-pdf list of symbols at http://www.physics.udel.edu/~dubois/lshort2e/node61.html#SECTION008100000000000000000

Can you find it there? :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[tex]\succ\prec[/tex] it looks like that except the gap between the top and bottom pieces is a bit more and they are together not separated. now what is this symbol the one that is highlighted as \asymp, cause that is the symbol it uses? and thank you :).
 
Last edited:
You mean [itex]x \asymp y[/itex]? Not sure, but it could mean x is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymptotically_equal_to" y. That is, x/y -> 1 in the limit.
I'm more familar with [itex]x\sim y[/itex] for this though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
i'll get the quote here:

"This is a startling fact that Stirling discovered:

n! (that symbol here) sqrt(2*pi)*e^(-n)*n^(n+(1/2))

To my mind, this is one of the quintessential discoveries of 18th century mathematics. A formula like this give us some idea of the astonishing transformation of mathematics"​


does that make sense
 
  • #11
Yes, that makes sense. See D.H.'s post above or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stirling%27s_formula" . They use [itex]\approx[/itex] and [itex]\sim[/itex] near the bottom of the page.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
thank you :).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K