Understanding Surge Protector Specs for the Computer Age

  • Thread starter Thread starter kiki_danc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding surge protector specifications, particularly in relation to their effectiveness and the technical details of various models. Participants explore concepts such as joules ratings, clamping voltage, and the differences between types of surge protection devices (SPDs) and surge protector strips.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of surge protectors, citing personal experience without damage to equipment over decades.
  • Another participant recounts a contrasting experience where many devices were damaged due to surges, suggesting that surge protectors are not a gimmick.
  • There is a discussion on how to compute the joules rating for surge protectors and what it corresponds to in terms of voltage and time.
  • Participants discuss the effectiveness of different surge protectors, including the importance of clamping voltage and the implications of using devices without grounding.
  • Some participants differentiate between Type I, II, and III surge protection devices, noting their placement and functionality in relation to circuit breakers.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential fire hazards associated with surge protectors, particularly in unattended locations.
  • There is a query about the compatibility of surge protector strips rated for 110 volts with a 220 volts system.
  • Participants express interest in features such as fail-safe modes in surge protectors and inquire about models that offer these features.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the effectiveness and necessity of surge protectors, with no consensus on whether they are essential or merely a precaution. There are also differing opinions on the technical specifications and their implications for safety and performance.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the limitations of surge protectors, including the risk of undetected failure and the importance of regular checks on their functionality. The discussion also highlights the complexity of comparing different surge protection technologies and their ratings.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in electrical safety, surge protection technology, and those considering the purchase of surge protectors or related devices for their home or office setups.

  • #211
jim hardy said:
It is the job of the grounding at the pole and service entrance to prevent that.

However lightning can do exactly what you describe. Happened to me once.
It's good practice to stay away from metal appliances when there's lightning in the neighborhood.

You will find this thread helpful.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/not-fully-understanding-grounds.622107/#post-4007190
See post #10.

Ok. I guess putting surge protectors between neutral and ground can minimize the shock(?) maybe that's why there is N-G (Neutral-Ground) protection mode besides L-N, L-G, N-G? Is this the purpose of the N-G mode? When you use the say Siemens 140,000A surge protector and a lightning with energy of 6000V, 130,000A hit the lines.. then the Siemens will absorb them leaving only the VPR of 600 volts?
Tom wrote earlier that
"Consider a nearby lightning strike that puts 6000V on the power line to ground. Much equipment is rated perhaps 600V or so from line to chassis, the the chassis is now at 6000V, and so is everything in it and connected to it. Is there anything near enough to the equipment that a 6000V spark can jump to? For instance the insulation in a transformer would likely break down if anything on its secondary is grounded or near a ground or a large conducting surface. If the transformer is mounted in an electrical box, the box would likely be grounded and the an arc would jump to the transformer core, to the box, to ground. If a person happens to be in contact with the equipment, he/she is now at 6000V; is the floor wet, person touching another piece of equipment at the same time?"

Anyway. I got so much information now that the most logical thing left is to start grounding all metal enclosure and know what surge protectors to use. I guess this is it. Thanks to all who supplied much useful and helpful information!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #212
kiki_danc said:
If a person happens to be in contact with the equipment, he/she is now at 6000V; is the floor wet, person touching another piece of equipment at the same time?"

Read in one of those links i posted my anecdote about holding a metal cased electric drill when lightning struck my power pole .
I learned most of what i understand about grounding in that visceral half second . I knew the instant it hit exactly what had happened.

So you use multiple protections wherever they're appropriate
grounding to limit voltage between people and earth
and double insulate to prevent current flow through people.In your above scenario ,
if lightning elevated local Earth to 6000 volts so the floor is also at 6000 volts then there's no potential difference to drive current through the person. That's why metal buildings are grounded .

You now have understanding of the principles of grounding
it will take you months to work out in your mind "what if" thought experiments that resolve apparent logical conflicts.
Kirchoff's laws of voltage and current are the thought tools.

have fun ,
and share your knowledge&experience with others as it grows..
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kiki_danc
  • #213
Thread is closed for a bit...
 
  • #214
The OP's question has been abundantly answered, so I'm closing this thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G, davenn and jim hardy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
5K