Understanding the .5 in Kinematic Equations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
checker
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Knowing and understanding the kinematic equation's variables x1, x0, v0, t, and a, how has .5 been incorporated into the equation?

I realized this unknown during lab. Now, as I've nearly completed my analysis, I find that the values I've derived for acceleration should be doubled!


Homework Equations


x1 = x0 + (v0 * t) + (.5 * a * t^2)


The Attempt at a Solution


By using dimensional analysis one can determine that each side of the equation yields distance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Constant acceleration

[tex]v= \int a dt = at+C[/tex]

t=0,v=v0


[tex]x=\int v dt = \int (v_0 +at) dt = v_o t + \frac{1}{2}at^2 +C_1[/tex]

t=0,x=x0⇒C1=x0

x=x0+v0t+½at2

how exactly do your values show that the '½' should be '2'?
 
I'm using Δx/Δt/Δt to produce a value for acceleration. When that value is applied to the kinematic equation, it returns value that does not coincide with the experimental result. By removing the .5, the answer is correct.
 
That's because Δx/Δt/Δt is not acceleration. Δx/Δt is not the maximum speed attained in Δt; it's the average speed, which is half the maximum speed (assuming constant acceleration). Acceleration would be 2Δx/Δt/Δt.
 
checker said:
I'm using Δx/Δt/Δt to produce a value for acceleration.
That is incorrect. The acceleration is Δv/Δt.

However, Δv is not the same as Δx/Δt, because: Δv is the change in velocity, while Δx/Δt is the average velocity.

For an easy example, consider the case of a constant (but nonzero) velocity. Clearly Δv and a are both zero. However Δx/Δt is not zero since the object is moving at constant velocity.
 
I was incorrectly using a vavg for Δv. I've changed my velocity calculations to reflect an instantaneous velocity, and so my calculations for acceleration are correct and my kinematic equation produces a correct result without any modification.