Understanding the Commutator [x, p^2]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ene Dene
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Operator
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 22K views
Ene Dene
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding the folowing:
(I'll write h for h/(2Pi))
Momentum in x direction is represented by operator
[tex]p=-ih\frac{d}{dx}[/tex].
So comutator
[tex][x,p]=xp-px=x(-ih)\frac{d}{dx}-(-ih)\frac{dx}{dx}=0+ih*1=ih.[/tex]
Now here comes the part that I don't understand. I'll calculate [x,p^2]:
[tex][x,p^2]=xp^2-p^2x=xpp-ppx[/tex],
but from:
[tex][x,p]=xp-px=ih[/tex]
I have:
[tex][x,p^2]=xpp-ppx=(ih+px)p-p(-ih+xp)=2ih+pxp-pxp=2ih[/tex]
As it should be. But why can't I say:
[tex]p^2=pp[/tex],
[tex](-ih)\frac{d}{dx}*(-ih)\frac{d}{dx}=-h^2\frac{d^2}{dx^2}[/tex]
And write:
[tex][x,p^2]=xp^2-p^2x=x*(-h^2\frac{d^2}{dx^2})+h^2\frac{d^2}{dx^2}(x)=0+0=0[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know how you are reducing the last line to zero. [x,p^2] in this representation is an operator. It needs to operate on something. Work out [x,p^2](f(x)) for an arbitrary function f(x).
 
try to apply the comutator on a arbitrary wavefunction[tex]\psi[/tex]. Remember that [itex]p^2[/itex] is not the p-operator squared, it is performed twice on a wavefunction:

[tex]p^2 \psi=-ih\frac{d}{dx} \left(-ih\frac{d}{dx} \psi \right)[/tex]

Edit: Dick was 5 seconds before me =)
 
Yes, of course, I understand now! Thank you!
 
Ene Dene said:
I'm having trouble understanding the folowing:
(I'll write h for h/(2Pi))
Momentum in x direction is represented by operator
[tex]p=-ih\frac{d}{dx}[/tex].
So comutator
[tex][x,p]=xp-px=x(-ih)\frac{d}{dx}-(-ih)\frac{dx}{dx}=0+ih*1=ih.[/tex]
Now here comes the part that I don't understand. I'll calculate [x,p^2]:
[tex][x,p^2]=xp^2-p^2x=xpp-ppx[/tex],
but from:
[tex][x,p]=xp-px=ih[/tex]
I have:
[tex][x,p^2]=xpp-ppx=(ih+px)p-p(-ih+xp)=2ih+pxp-pxp=2ih[/tex]
the third equal sign is the above equation is incorrect (you didn't distribute the p correctly). The equation should read:

[tex] [x,p^2]=xpp-ppx=(ih+px)p-p(-ih+xp)=2ihp+pxp-pxp=2ihp[/tex]

In general
[tex] [x,f(p)]=i\hbar f'(p)[/tex]
and the above is a special case with f(p)=p^2.:wink:
 
Last edited:
You better also had done the first one that way, as not to get confused by what the differential operator acts on.

Let f denote a function of x, then
[tex][x,p]f = xpf-pxf=x(-ih)\frac{df}{dx}-(-ih)\frac{dxf}{dx}= -i h x f' + i h (f + x f') = i h f[/tex]
so dropping the function we see [tex][x, p] = i h[/tex].

And this method will give you the correct result for any commutator (just remember, the differentiation operator works as far as possible to the right, so [itex]\frac{d}{dx} x f[/itex] really is [itex]\frac{d (x f)}{dx}[/itex] and not [itex]\left( \frac{dx}{dx} \right) \cdot f[/itex]).
 
Last edited:
malawi_glenn said:
try to apply the comutator on a arbitrary wavefunction[tex]\psi[/tex]. Remember that [itex]p^2[/itex] is not the p-operator squared, it is performed twice on a wavefunction:

[tex]p^2 \psi=-ih\frac{d}{dx} \left(-ih\frac{d}{dx} \psi \right)[/tex]

Edit: Dick was 5 seconds before me =)

How come there is no h^2 term after we do it this way? Using the definition, I don't see why I only get an h and not h^2.
 
Last edited: