Understanding the Derivative of ln(cos x) for Plane Curves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobsmith76
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cos Derivative Ln
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the tangent vector, normal vector, and curvature for the plane curve defined by the parametric equation r(t) = ti + ln(cos(t)). Participants are particularly focused on understanding the derivative of ln(cos(t)) and its implications in the context of plane curves.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of the chain rule in differentiating ln(cos(t)), questioning why the derivative is not simply 1/cos(t). There is a discussion about the composition of functions and the necessity of considering both the outer and inner functions when applying the chain rule.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants attempting to clarify the application of the chain rule and its relevance to the problem. Some have expressed partial understanding, while others continue to question the reasoning behind the derivative resulting in -tan(t). There is no explicit consensus yet, but guidance on the chain rule has been provided.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the interpretation of derivatives in the context of logarithmic and trigonometric functions, and there seems to be some confusion regarding the application of rules for differentiation in this specific case.

bobsmith76
Messages
336
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



the question is for plane curves. find T N and k for the plane curves

1. r(t) = ti + ln (cos t)

the derivative of ln x is 1/|x|, so why isn't the derivative of ln cos x, 1/cos x or sec x?

My book says the answer is - tan x
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Because \ln{\cos{x}} is actually a composition of the functions \ln{x} and \cos{x}. Therefore you need to use the chain rule.
 
I put in the question into the original post. I don't see how they're using the chain rule. They aren't deriving two terms, it's just ln (cos t). if they're driving t, then i would think the derivative of t would just be 1.
 
you need to use the derivative of ln r(t), which is r'(t)/ r (t)
try that!
 
Consider this problem: Find the derivative of ##y=\ln t^2##.

First method: Using the property of logs, we pull the exponent out front.
$$y=\ln t^2 = 2\ln t$$ When you differentiate this, you get
$$y' = 2\left(\frac{1}{t}\right).$$ This is the correct answer.

Second method: Just "differentiate" the way you did
$$y' = \frac{1}{t^2}.$$ This is wrong. Why is it wrong?
 
but there's no exponent involved here. plus look at this problem: they just derive everything normally here. they don't do the r'/r

Screenshot2012-02-26at52420AM.png
 
The chain rule says that the derivative of f(g(t)) is f'(g(t))g'(t).
This is what vela illustrated.

In your case, for ln(cos(t)), you have calculated f'(g(t)) which is 1/cos(t), but you still need to multiply by g'(t) which is the derivative of cos(t).
 
ok, I sort of understand.
 
bobsmith76 said:
ok, I sort of understand.

So do you understand how the book got -tan(t)?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K