Understanding the Dirac Delta function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the understanding and properties of the Dirac Delta function, particularly in relation to its behavior with respect to two variables, ##x## and ##y##. Participants explore its definitions and applications, focusing on its role in integrals and its classification as a distribution or measure.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an expression involving the Dirac Delta function and seeks confirmation of its correctness.
  • Another participant asserts that the presented expressions are incorrect without providing specific corrections.
  • A third participant clarifies that the Dirac Delta is not a traditional function and can be defined as a distribution or measure.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the Dirac Delta function should be understood in the context of integrals, suggesting that the integral form of the expression is necessary for proper interpretation.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of the expressions presented in the initial post, with one participant stating that the second expression does not make sense.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to agree on the correctness of the initial expressions involving the Dirac Delta function. Multiple competing views are presented regarding its definition and application, indicating an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for clarity on the definitions of the Dirac Delta function and its treatment as a generalized function, as well as the necessity of integrals in its application.

redtree
Messages
335
Reaction score
15
I just want to make sure that I am understanding the Dirac Delta function properly. Is the following correct?:

For two variables ##x## and ##y##:
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
\delta(x-y) f(x) &= f(y)
\end{split}
\end{equation}

And:
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
\delta(x-x) f(x) &= f(x)
\end{split}
\end{equation}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neither of those is correct.
 
The Dirac delta is not a function in the traditional sense, it can be rigorously defined either as a distribution or as a measure.
Ssnow
 
The Dirac delta function is defined as a generalized function by its behavior in an integral: ∫f(x)δ(x)dx = f(0).
So in your question, ∫δ(x-y)f(x)dx = f(y) would make better sense than your expression (1). The integral can not be omitted. Your expression (2) does not make sense to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K