Understanding the Discrete Nature of k in Photonic Crystals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the discrete nature of the wavevector k in photonic crystals, specifically in relation to the dispersion relation. It is established that each k corresponds to a distinct mode within a band, and that the dispersion relation appears continuous for infinite crystals while being discretized for finite crystals. The equation governing this relationship is given by the eigenequation involving the magnetic field H(r) and the dielectric function ε(r). The periodic boundary conditions applied to a 1D crystal with N unit cells lead to k values separated by a distance of 2π/(Na).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of photonic crystals and their periodic dielectric structures.
  • Familiarity with the eigenequation for electromagnetic waves in media.
  • Knowledge of dispersion relations and their significance in wave propagation.
  • Basic concepts of boundary conditions in quantum mechanics and solid-state physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of periodic boundary conditions in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the derivation of dispersion relations in finite versus infinite crystals.
  • Explore the role of band gaps in photonic crystals and their implications for wave propagation.
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of Hermitian eigenproblems in the context of photonic structures.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers working in the field of photonics, particularly those focused on the design and analysis of photonic crystals and their applications in controlling light propagation.

krindik
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
Hi,
I have this quite basic question regarding photonic crystals.
As I understand, a periodic dielectric structure (photonic crystal) has modes (spatial profiles) at discrete frequencies from:
\nabla \times \Big( \frac{1}{\epsilon(r)}\nabla \times H(r) \Big) = \frac{\omega^2}{c^2} H(r)

However, dispersion diagrams (\omega vs. k) are continuous plots.

Doesn't each k characterize a different mode?
I'm referring "Photonic Crystals Molding the Flow of Light" and believe it's the best book to learn about photonic crystals.


Really appreciate some guidance.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, each k represents a different mode (or more accurately, each k represents a single mode in each band). The dispersion relation is technically only continuous for infinite crystals, and if you consider finite crystals, the allowed k's become discretized. For example, if you were to apply periodic boundary conditions on a 1D crystal with a total of N unit cells of lattice constant a, you'd find that the k's are separated by a distance of \frac{2 \pi}{N a}.

So, you're right: a continuous dispersion relation makes no sense in the context of a finite crystal. To get the continuous dispersion relation, what you're really doing is trying to find solutions of the form \mathbf{H}(r) = e^{i k \cdot r} \mathbf{u}_k(r) (where k can be continuous). If you plug that back into your eigenequation and solve for \mathbf{u}_k under periodic boundary conditions on the unit cell, you get a Hermitian eigenproblem that is also k-dependent. Its solutions are countable, and correspond to different bands.

Practically speaking, the reason people solve for the continuous dispersion relation is that the boundaries of the crystal are usually far away, and that means that the discretization of k is usually negligible.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the words of wisdom !
I was a bit confused in going from chapter 2 in this excellent book as nowhere did I read about the discrete nature of k: \frac{2 \pi}{N a} in an non-infinite crystal.

I can understand the periodic nature of k in: <br /> \mathbf{H}(r) = e^{i k \cdot r} \mathbf{u}_k(r)<br /> where the period number is called 'band'. (guess this is correct).
But does this imply the continuity of k within a period?
Or why does k has to be continuous even in an infinite crystal?
Does it mean any wavelength (excluding the band gap) can freely exist in the crystal?
Then again, the derivation of discrete frequencies was not based on infinite extent of the crystal.

Really appreciate if u could give some advice.

Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K