Understanding the Distinctions Between MOFs, COFs, and POPs: A Brief Overview

  • Thread starter Thread starter KarolinaPL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metal Organic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the distinctions between Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs), Covalent Organic Polymers (COFs), and Porous Organic Polymers (POPs). MOFs are characterized by metal ions linked to organic ligands through coordination bonds, while COFs and POPs utilize covalent bonds. COFs are defined as crystalline structures, whereas POPs are generally amorphous. In summary, MOFs are coordination compounds, COFs are crystalline versions of POPs, and POPs are amorphous polymers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coordination chemistry and bonding structures
  • Familiarity with polymer chemistry concepts
  • Knowledge of crystallinity and amorphous materials
  • Basic grasp of metal-organic frameworks and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the synthesis methods for Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs)
  • Explore the properties and applications of Covalent Organic Polymers (COFs)
  • Investigate the structural characteristics of Porous Organic Polymers (POPs)
  • Learn about the role of coordination bonds in material science
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, chemists, and materials scientists interested in the structural and functional properties of advanced porous materials.

KarolinaPL
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
What are the differences between 1) Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs), 2) Covalent Organic Polymers (COFs) and 3) Porous Organic Polymers (POPs)?? 2 are the same like 1, but there is no coordination bond just covalent bonds? 3 there is no metal atom? how to distinguish between such a similar species?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The given three examples have some difference depending on how you classify them.

If you are talking purely in terms of bonding structure, then 1) can be distinguished from 2) and 3). MOFs are composed of metal ion that links organic ligands by coordination bonds. COFs and POPs are composed of covalent bonds.

In terms of periodicity and its well-defined structure, 1) and 2) can be distinguished from 3). In a strict definition (one that is commonly used), COFs are crystalline, well-defined version of POPs, and MOFs are coordination compound version of POPs, since POPs are generally considered amorphous. In a broad sense, COFs are part of POPs.
 
So...

1) MOFs (inorganic-organic hydrids which consist of metal/metal clusters nodes and organic ligand as linkers, can be crystalline, amorphous, micro- or mesoporous),
2) crystalline COPs (extended organic structures where building blocks are linked by strong covalent bonds, they are made entirely from light elements (H, B, C, N, and O), micro- or mesoporous),
3) amorphous POPs (a class of highly crosslinked polymers possessing (microporous or porous)) ?

THANK YOU! :smile:
 
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
5K