Understanding the Doppler Effect: Solving the Bat Problem

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving a Doppler effect problem involving a bat and an insect. The bat is first treated as the sound source, emitting a 40.0-kHz chirp, and then as the observer receiving a 40.4 kHz echo. The key confusion arises from why both frequencies are set to the reflected wave in the second step. It's clarified that the first step calculates the frequency observed by the insect, which then acts as the source frequency for the bat's observation. Correctly distinguishing between the observed frequency and the source frequency is crucial for accurate calculations in this two-stage process.
physicsfan999
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A bat flying at 4.10 m/s is chasing an insect flying in the same direction. The bat emits a 40.0-kHz chirp and receives back an echo at 40.4 kHz. (Take the speed of sound in air to be 340 m/s.)
Relevant Equations
f_o=f_s(v+v_o/v-v_s)
I'm struggling a lot with this problem on the Doppler effect. I understand the first step which is to treat the bat as the source of the emitted sound, giving

1614718292037.png


And the second to treat the bat now as the observer, but instead of using f_b on the left the solution involves setting both frequencies to the reflected wave.
1614718268174.png

I understand there should 2 different variables here for the equation to make sense but I need help understanding why the second step involves setting the two frequencies the same. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physicsfan999 said:
Homework Statement:: A bat flying at 4.10 m/s is chasing an insect flying in the same direction. The bat emits a 40.0-kHz chirp and receives back an echo at 40.4 kHz. (Take the speed of sound in air to be 340 m/s.)
Relevant Equations:: f_o=f_s(v+v_o/v-v_s)

I'm struggling a lot with this problem on the Doppler effect. I understand the first step which is to treat the bat as the source of the emitted sound, giving

View attachment 279012

And the second to treat the bat now as the observer, but instead of using f_b on the left the solution involves setting both frequencies to the reflected wave.
View attachment 279011
I understand there should 2 different variables here for the equation to make sense but I need help understanding why the second step involves setting the two frequencies the same. Thanks in advance!
As you correctly say, this is a 2-stage process. In stage-1 we find the observed frequency (##f_i##) with the insect as the observer). In stage-2 we treat ##f_i## as the source frequency because this is the frequency of the reflected signal sent from the insect to the bat.

Your final equation$$f_i = f_i (\frac {343 + v_b}{343 + v_i})$$is wrong. You need to give the final observed frequency (by the bat) a different symbol:$$f_{observed-by-bat} = f_i (\frac {343 + v_b}{343 + v_i})$$Can I suggest you watch this:
Edit - typo' corrected.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, Doc Al and rsk
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
743
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K