Understanding the Drag Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarkFalz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the drag equation and its derivation, particularly in relation to air resistance. The participant has explored the formula's origins, referencing NASA's resources, and is trying to grasp the steps involved. They understand the initial concept of momentum change due to a body moving through a fluid but are confused about the velocity terms in the equations. The key point clarified is that the velocity in the drag equation represents the relative velocity between the body and the fluid. This understanding is crucial for applying the drag equation effectively in real-world scenarios.
DarkFalz
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
For several years i have thought about air (fluid) resistance without getting deeper into the formulas that model its behaviour. Recently, I've decided to take one more step in the subject and learn some of these formulas.

I've learned about the drag equation, and at first glance it seemed like a "pretty" formula, which could answer my questions regarding air resistance in everyday affairs.

Yet, i have decided to try to understand it and its origins, and so i took a look at NASA's website and checked this link https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/momntm.html

I don't know if i am correctly understanding the several steps involved in the derivation of the drag equation. I am familiar with Newton's laws and the concept of linear momentum, so i think i understand the first step. It is saying that if a body when moving through a fluid causes its momentum to change from 0 to m*v over a given amount of time T, then a force with average value m*v / T acted upon the moving body throught the period of time T, right?

I am not that much familiar with the second step, but i think i get the point, basically they're determining the amount of the fluid that the body will colide with if it is moving through the fluid with velocity V and has a contact surface A with the fluid.

The point that i am missing, is why the V involved in the first formula (m*V / T), which i assume is the velocity of the fluid, is the same V from the mdot equation, which is related to the velocity of the body passing through the fluid, or so did understand understand.

Thanks for the attention
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DarkFalz said:
why the V involved in the first formula (m*V / T), which i assume is the velocity of the fluid, is the same V from the mdot equation, which is related to the velocity of the body passing through the fluid
It's the relative velocity between body and fluid.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K