Understanding the Heaviside Function and Rewriting Sine Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicolayh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Sine
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Heaviside function and the rewriting of a piecewise function involving sine, specifically f(t) defined for different intervals of t. Participants are exploring how to express this function in a different form, particularly in the context of Laplace transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial formulation of f(t) and the implications of using the Heaviside function to express it. There is a focus on understanding the reasoning behind the coefficients in the rewritten form and the role of the Heaviside function in defining the intervals of the piecewise function.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants questioning their assumptions about the Heaviside function and its application in this context. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of u(t), but there is no explicit consensus on the rewriting of the function yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and properties of the Heaviside function, particularly in relation to the piecewise nature of f(t). There is a mention of assumptions made about the scaling of the sine function and its impact on the rewritten expression.

nicolayh
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[tex]f(t) = \left\{ \begin{array}{rcl}<br /> 5sin(t) & \mbox{for}<br /> & 0 < t < 2\pi \\<br /> 0 & \mbox{for} & t > 2\pi<br /> \end{array}\right.[/tex]

Now, the problem is about rewriting f(t). My friend and I decided that it had to be

[tex]\dfrac{10 - 5e^{-2\pi s}}{s^2 + 1}[/tex]

However, the answer turned out to be [tex]\dfrac{5 - 5e^{-2\pi s}}{s^2 + 1}[/tex]

Any help towards understanding this would be greatly appreciated! (We assumed they divided the first part by [tex]2\pi[/tex] when we extended [tex]5sin(t)[/tex] to [tex]5sin(t - 2\pi)[/tex], but we don't understand why!)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you begin by writing

[tex]f(t) = 5\sin t(u(t) - u(t-2\pi) )[/tex]?
 
LCKurtz said:
Did you begin by writing

[tex]f(t) = 5\sin t(u(t) - u(t-2\pi) )[/tex]?

Yeah, but we thought in this case that u(t) was [tex]2\pi[/tex], I guess that wasn't the case? :P
 
nicolayh said:
Yeah, but we thought in this case that u(t) was [tex]2\pi[/tex], I guess that wasn't the case? :P

Nope, I guess not. u(t) is either 0 or 1.
 
Thank you very much! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K