Understanding the Logarithm of K in DeltaG

  • Thread starter Thread starter aniketp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between Gibbs free energy (\Delta G) and the equilibrium constant (K) in the context of the equation \Delta G = RTln(K). It addresses the concern about K not being dimensionless and clarifies that the logarithm can be taken because K is divided by a reference constant (K0), making the quotient dimensionless. The conversation also highlights the significance of the Nernst-Planck equation in understanding chemical potential changes and membrane potential in diffusive processes. The importance of grasping these concepts is emphasized, as they are fundamental yet often overlooked in the study of thermodynamics. Understanding these relationships is crucial for deeper insights into chemical equilibria and reaction dynamics.
aniketp
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Well I read in a book that:
\DeltaG= RTln (K) (Where K is the eqm const)
H "K" is not necessarily dimensionless so how can we take a log of "K"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean Gibbs free energy?

then it's given by:
\tau log(Z_G)
after taking the derivative you can get the difference or differential form of this energy.
Z_G is the Grand canonical partition function, and it's indeed dimensionless.
 
The full Nernst-Planck equation is:

\Delta\mu=RTln(\frac{[x_{i}]}{[x_{o}]})+ZF(\psi_{i}-\psi_{o}), where

\Delta\mu is the change in chemical potential for a particular species

[x_{i}] is the concentration of species 'x' on one side of a dividing surface (and [x_{o}] the concentration on the other side)

\psi_{i} the electrical potential on one side of a dividing surface (and \psi_{o} the potential on the other side)

And R, T, Z, F the usual gas constant, temperature, charge per molecule and Faraday constant.

It's worth understanding this equation- it governs diffusive processes of charged solutes in solution and leads to a remarkable (IMO) result: the membrane potential. There's various simplifications, it looks like you have uncharged solutes (Z = 0), and instead of \Delta\mu you are using \Delta G, which also changes the \frac{[x_{i}]}{[x_{o}]} term to the equilibrium constant. But, since it's still dimensionless, there's no problem.

Does that help? This is a really fundamental concept- make sure you understand it.
 
It's often ignored, but the K inside the logarithm is divided by K0, which has magnitude of 1 and the same units. The quotient is therefore dimensionless and equal to the magnitude of K.

EDIT: Whoops, Andy got there first with a more complete answer.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top