Stargazing Understanding the Magnification of a Telescope: Why is M = f_o / f_e?

Click For Summary
The magnification of a two converging lens telescope is expressed as M = f_o / f_e, where f_o is the focal length of the objective lens and f_e is the focal length of the eyepiece. This formula represents angular magnification, which differs from linear magnification defined as image distance over object distance. The confusion arises because, at infinity, both image and object distances approach infinity, yet magnification still exists. The relationship between angular magnification and the focal lengths is derived from the angles subtended by the object and image at their respective focal points. Ultimately, both angular and focal length ratios are equivalent and illustrate the same magnification principle.
quietrain
Messages
648
Reaction score
2
hi, i don't understand why the 2 converging lens telescope's magnification is given by M = f_o / f_e

where f_o = focal length of objective, and f_e = focal length of eyepiece...

issn't M = image distance / object distance...

in the case of a infinity object, the image is also infinity for the eye to view it without straining.

so why is there still a magnification ? infinity over infinity?

need help thanks a lot!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
quietrain said:
the 2 converging lens telescope's magnification is given by M = f_o / f_e

This is angular magnification.

issn't M = image distance / object distance...

This is linear magnification.

They're different things.
 
oh. i see.

i look up the angular magnification and the formula was

M = tan E / tan E_0 (wikipedia)

where E_0 = the angle subtended by the object at the front focal point of the objective and E =the angle subtended by the image at the rear focal point of the eyepiece.

so how does this become the formula

M = f_o / f_e ?

even with small angle approximation the formula M = tan E / tan E_0 is still not M = f_o / f_e ?
 
The two formulas for angular magnificaion are equivalent by their very nature and you don't need to prove equality by making arithmetic substitutions
They are both ratios (the focal length equation is simply a ratio of spatial dimensions, where as the angle equations is a ratio of the angles subtended by the magnitude of these dimensions)
Both ratios are in direct proportion.
 
UC Berkely, December 16, 2025 https://news.berkeley.edu/2025/12/16/whats-powering-these-mysterious-bright-blue-cosmic-flashes-astronomers-find-a-clue/ AT 2024wpp, a luminous fast blue optical transient, or LFBOT, is the bright blue spot at the upper right edge of its host galaxy, which is 1.1 billion light-years from Earth in (or near) a galaxy far, far away. Such objects are very bright (obiously) and very energetic. The article indicates that AT 2024wpp had a peak luminosity of 2-4 x...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 226 ·
8
Replies
226
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K