Understanding the Relationship Between A and B: A Variation Analysis

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between two variables, A and B, specifically examining the concept of variation in the context of mathematical functions. Participants explore how variations in B affect A, using specific functions and mathematical reasoning to analyze the implications of these variations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if A is a function of B, then a variation in A can be expressed as a differential, suggesting that δA = dA.
  • Another participant questions the validity of this approach, indicating that the definition of variation needs to be considered more carefully.
  • A participant introduces a specific function, f(x) = 1/√x, and derives a relationship between δA and δB, leading to the conclusion that δA/A = -1/2 (δB/B).
  • Further exploration reveals that adding a constant c to the function complicates the relationship, as it introduces a dependence that cannot be easily canceled out.
  • A later reply acknowledges a misconception regarding the independence of variation from the constant c, suggesting that the variation is indeed affected by the presence of c.
  • Another participant suggests using Taylor expansion to formalize the relationship between variations, indicating that δA can be expressed in terms of δB through derivatives.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of constants in the context of variation, with some suggesting that constants should not affect the variation while others argue that they do. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these constants on the variation analysis.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the treatment of variations may depend on the specific form of the function and the presence of constants, leading to potential limitations in the generalizability of their conclusions.

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
Suppose I have such an equation:
[itex]A= f(B)[/itex]
so [itex]A[/itex] is a function of [itex]B[/itex].

Can I really use the fact that a variation of [itex]A[/itex] is like taking the differential of it?
[itex]\delta A= dA[/itex]

so that:

[itex]\delta A = \frac{d f(B)}{dB} \delta B[/itex]
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Superficially it looks OK. You need to look at the definition involved for variation.
 
the reason I ask is because I have a confusion with one more way to see variation.
Suppose I vary [itex]B[/itex], so that [itex]A[/itex] is going to be varied too:

[itex]A+ \delta A = f(B+\delta B)[/itex]
And suppose [itex]f(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}[/itex]

Then:

[itex]A( 1+ \frac{\delta A}{A}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{B+\delta B}}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{B}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\frac{\delta B}{B}}}≈ A -A \frac{1}{2} \frac{\delta B}{B}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{\delta A}{A}= - \frac{1}{2} \frac{\delta B}{B}[/itex]This result would imply that:
[itex]\frac{d f(B)}{dB} = -\frac{1}{2}\frac{A}{B}[/itex]

in my OP...

with a simple check, we have:

[itex]\frac{d (1/ \sqrt{B})}{dB} = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{B^{3/2}}[/itex]

This method works fine for such an easy function as [itex]f(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}[/itex]
Now suppose I have instead:
[itex]f(x)= \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}} + c[/itex]

with [itex]c[/itex] a constant. The same method won't work because I will end up with something like:

[itex]\frac{\delta A}{A} = - \frac{1}{A} \frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{B}} \frac{\delta B}{B}[/itex]

unfortunately now [itex]\frac{1}{A}[/itex] can't be canceled with the [itex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}[/itex] ... Only maybe, up to some error, if I consider [itex]c[/itex] very small... The derivative however will kill [itex]c[/itex] and give some other result (the same as for without [itex]c[/itex] which I think is more physical- isn't it? a constant shouldn't destroy the variations)..
 
Last edited:
I think I found my misconception... the variation is still independent of [itex]c[/itex]... it's 1/A which gives me that dependence. So there's no way to escape from c rather than neglecting it :) that's fine...i guess
 
You can basically use Taylor expansion to show your equality.

If ##A=f(B)## and we add a small quantity ##\delta B## to ##B## then by Taylor's theorem we will have:

$$A'\equiv A+\delta A=f(B+\delta B)=f(B)+\frac{df}{dB}\delta B+\mathcal{O}(\delta B^2)$$

This gives as the limit ##\delta B\rightarrow 0##:

$$\delta A=\frac{df}{dB}\delta B$$

Of course, this is usually much more interesting when we consider functionals rather than simple functions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K