Understanding the Relationship Between Integration and Anti-differentiation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Muthumanimaran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Muthumanimaran
Messages
79
Reaction score
2
While attempting proof for Integration is anti-differentiation from the book Mathematical methods for physics, Riley, Hobson
How the R.H.S of the equation (after rearranging and dividing by Λx) becomes f(x)Λx?
 

Attachments

  • Anti-differentiation rule.jpg
    Anti-differentiation rule.jpg
    33.9 KB · Views: 427
Physics news on Phys.org
Muthumanimaran said:
How the R.H.S of the equation (after rearranging and dividing by Λx) becomes f(x)Λx?
Well, the (Riemann) integral from a to b is defined as the upper limit of [itex]\sum_{\bigcup \Delta x = [a, b]}f(x)\cdot\Delta x[/itex]. So, if you put a=x and b=x+Δx, you get the first element in the sum. Which means that [itex]\int_{x}^{x+\Delta x}f(x)dx[/itex] is the upper limit of [itex]f(x)\cdot \Delta x[/itex] (as Δx→0).