Why is there a differential in an indefinite integral?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of the differential notation in indefinite integrals, specifically why the differential "dx" is necessary in the expression ∫ƒ(x)dx for antiderivatives. Participants explore the implications of this notation for techniques such as substitution and the relationship between integrals and antiderivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the necessity of "dx" in the notation for indefinite integrals, questioning its role in indicating the process of anti-differentiation.
  • Another participant suggests that "dx" indicates the variable of integration, similar to how "d/dx" indicates differentiation with respect to x.
  • A different viewpoint challenges the dependency of substitution techniques on the notation, proposing that alternative symbols could be used without affecting the validity of the methods.
  • One participant argues that the notation for integrals is used to discuss antiderivatives, referencing the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus as a connection between the two concepts.
  • Another participant critiques the terminology of "indefinite integrals," suggesting that it may confuse students and proposing an alternative notation for antiderivatives.
  • A later reply indicates that one participant has found clarity on the topic through external resources, implying that the issue may not be as complex as initially thought.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and implications of the differential notation in indefinite integrals. There is no consensus on whether the current notation is appropriate or beneficial for understanding the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the potential confusion arising from the terminology and notation used for antiderivatives and integrals, noting that there may be a lack of clarity in educational contexts regarding these concepts.

Jow
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
I understand why a definite integral of the form ^{b}_{a}∫ƒ(x)dx has the differential dx in it. What I don't understand, and what my teacher hasn't explained is why an indefinite integral (i.e. an antiderivative) requires the differential. Why does ∫ƒ(x)dx require that dx to mean "anti-differentiate"? To put it another way, why is the notation for the antiderivative an integral? It's obviously more than a question of notation, however, as without the differential techniques like u-substitution don't work. I hope this question makes sense, but this is something that has been bothering me for a while now. I figured my teacher would get to it eventually, but he hasn't yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Short answer. It tells you what is the variable for integration. Analog is d/dx to tell you the derivative is with respect to x.
 
Why would techniques like substitution not work, or be dependent on notation? You could replace dx by "Ix" if you wanted and substitution would still work!

\int f(u(x))u'(x) Ix = \int f(u) Iu
 
Jow said:
To put it another way, why is the notation for the antiderivative an integral?

It's actually the other way around; we use the notation for integrals to talk about antiderivatives. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus provides a link between the two concepts.

I am not aware of any notation specifically used to talk about antiderivatives, though I propose we begin using ##\frac{d^{-1}}{dx}f## to denote the family of functions whose derivatives are ##f## (which I'm certain will never happen). Most modern textbooks that I'm familiar with either don't have a notation until integration is introduced or they "cheat" and use the usual notation, ##\int f\ dx##, before students learn about integration with little to no explanation for why that is the chosen notation.

In my opinion, referring to antiderivatives as "indefinite integrals" and denoting them by ##\int f\ dx## is an unnecessary abuse of terminology and notation that serves more to confuse students (and some calculus teachers, I'm sure) than it helps them communicate mathematical ideas.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
35K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K