Understanding the Tacoma Bridge Collapse: Causes and Differences in Resonance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ukitake Jyuushirou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge Collapse
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse, exploring the concept of resonance and its implications in structural engineering, particularly in relation to earthquakes and building stability. Participants examine the differences between forced resonance and normal resonance, as well as the broader effects of resonance in various systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls using the Tacoma Bridge as an example of resonance in a physics class and questions the specific causes of its collapse.
  • Another participant discusses how resonance frequency matching can lead to amplified motion in structures, particularly if the entire structure has a similar resonance frequency.
  • There are mentions of modern building techniques in Japan that utilize damping systems to mitigate the effects of external forces like wind or earthquakes.
  • Concerns are raised about various factors contributing to structural collapse during earthquakes, including soil liquefaction, geographical amplification of seismic waves, and poor building practices.
  • A participant expresses interest in the phenomenon of resonance and questions whether humans have a resonant frequency and the extent of resonance effects.
  • One participant explains simple harmonic motion (SHM) and its relation to resonance, using examples of sound production and musical instruments to illustrate the concept.
  • It is noted that while human bodies are generally well damped, certain parts like vocal cords can resonate effectively.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the specific causes of the Tacoma Bridge collapse or the broader implications of resonance. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the effects of resonance in different contexts.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various assumptions about resonance and its applications without resolving the complexities involved in structural engineering and the specific conditions that lead to resonance-related failures.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and professionals in physics, engineering, and architecture, as well as those curious about the principles of resonance and its practical implications in real-world structures.

Ukitake Jyuushirou
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
i remember in high school my physics teacher used the example of tacoma bridge to teach us resonance. what exactly is it that caused tacoma to collapse?

how is forced resonanace different from normal resonance?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
thank u very much

another question, in an earthquake does resonance cause buildings to collapse?
 
Well, the real problem is movement and its effects on the loading. If a structure like the Tacoma Narrow Bridge are constructed with a resonance frequency that is similar throughout the structure, then it will not damp motion well and instead allow it to amplify motion with the external excitement. If you search on modern building techniques used in Japan (and elsewhere) you'll find a few examples of active or passive damping systems to control movement of a building when an outside force is applied, either from wind or an earthquake.

There are a lot of other reasons for structural collapse in an earthquake and the type of earthquake too. It could be liquifaction of the soil (ground acts like liquid) or the geography of the area like Mexico City that amplifies seismic waves like a bowl of jello. Or even more common is likely just plain poor building techniques and materials not designed to handle the loading from the movement.
 
i am interested in this resonance phenomenon which i do not understand much about.

i understand that resonance is the tendency of a system to absorb more energy when the frequency of the oscillations matches the system's natural frequency of vibration.

does this mean that all humans have a resonant frequency?

how far reaching is the effects of resonance?
 
Think of simple harmonic motion (SHM) of a small weight and a spring. If the spring is held vertically supporting the weight below it and you pull the weight down a little, it will spring back. However, it doesn't stop at the starting point, it goes right past, then back down to close to where you pulled it, and back up past the starting point...and so on. Add more weight and it will happen more slowly, add more spring and it will happen faster. Place the weight/spring sideways on a table where there is friction, and now it will damp more quickly, add some oil and it will continue longer. Et cetera.

If you knock your knuckles on your desk it makes a sound, if you knock your knuckles on a door it will make a different sound, and if you knock your knuckles on the a musical drum it will also sound different. So your knuckles aren't a very good sound producer, but those surfaces are good at making sound to certain degrees. When you knock on them, you deliver a sharp pulse to them, and this pulse in effect excites all frequencies. Yet you only hear some of them - why? Because of the resonance of each surface, and the damping is how long they 'ring' after you strike them.

Musical instruments are based on resonance, think of a guitar string. By placing your fingers at different spots on the fretboard, you are changing both the spring and mass ratio of the string (like SHM), and hence its fundamental vibration frequency.

Human bodies don't really work well for resonance, the body overall is too well damped. However, vocal chords are a part of the body in tension to add more spring, and along with low mass and they do resonate very well to make audible sounds. Also, if you were to fart, it has its own sound, again caused by a resonance in that area. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K