Undergrad Understanding the Transition Functions for S^1 Using Atlas Charts

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving transition functions for the circle S^1 using two charts, φ1 and φ2, and understanding their application. The transition function on the intersection of the two charts is identified as the identity function on the upper half-circle and a function that adds 2π on the lower half-circle, with the inverse function subtracting 2π. Participants clarify that coordinates (x,y) exist in ℝ², while the coordinates α and β are defined on the manifold S^1. The importance of identifying charts for meaningful expressions is emphasized, as well as the relevance of covering spaces and maps for understanding the transition functions. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying theoretical concepts to practical examples in manifold theory.
orion
Messages
93
Reaction score
2
I am confused about the procedure for finding the transition functions given an atlas. I understand the theory; it's applying it to real life examples where I have my problem. So for example, take S1 (the circle). I want to use 2 charts given by:

U1 = {α: 0 < α < 2π} φ1 = (cos α, sin α)
U2 = {β: -π < β < π} φ2 = (cos β, sin β)

Now I want to derive the transition function which is where I'm stuck. I know that α = arctan(y/x) and that β = arctan(y/x) which to me implies (and rightly so I think) that α = β on the overlap. My question is what is the transition function?

Another question I have is how are things improved using these 2 patches over 1 patch (which I know fails due to continuity of φ-1)?

Thanks in advance for any insight!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The transition function is defined on the intersection of the domains of the two functions. Since each domain is missing one point from the circle, and the missing points are antipodal to one another, the intersection is the two open half-circles one gets when one removes the points (1,0) and (-1,0) from the unit circle in the Cartesian plane.

The transition functions and their inverses will be the identity function ##\theta\mapsto \theta## on the upper half circle.
On the lower half circle it will be a function that adds 2 pi, with its inverse subtracting 2 pi.
 
  • Like
Likes orion
Thank you. I'm still a little confused as to why subtracting or adding 2π is necessary.

I have another question because this is what really confuses me.

Given a manifold M and a homeomorphism φ: U → V with U ⊂ M and V ⊂ ℝn. In the example above, which coordinates (x,y) or α "live" on the manifold and which "live" in ℝn? I'm pretty sure that the (x,y) live in ℝ2 but I just want to hear it.

This is important because φ o φ-1 takes V1→V2 and should only be functions of those coordinates.

Thanks again for your help!.
 
You are correct. Strictly speaking, there are no coordinates on the manifold. The coordinates are for points in the Euclidean image spaces of the charts. When we say 'the point in M with coordinates (x,y)' what we mean is 'the point p such that ##\phi(p)=(x,y)##. Hence the expression is meaningless unless a chart ##\phi## has been unambiguously identified, either explicitly or implicitly.

To understand the addition or subtraction of 2 pi, and to more generally understand the relationship of ##S^1## to ##\mathbb R^1##, the concept of 'covering space' and 'covering map' are helpful. The wiki page on them is quite good. It specifically lists the case you are working on as an example (third bullet point).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes orion

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K