Understanding Transfer Function Notation in Circuit Engineering

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the transfer function notation used in circuit engineering, specifically from "Basic Engineering Circuit Analysis" 8th Edition by Irwin/Nelms. The transfer function is expressed as \(\bar H(j\omega) = \frac{K_0(j\omega)^{\pm N} (1+j\omega\tau_1)(1+2\zeta_3(j\omega\tau_3)+(j\omega\tau_3)^2)\cdots}{(1+j\omega \tau_a)(1+2\zeta_b(j \omega \tau_b)+(j \omega \tau_b)^2)\cdots\). The notation involves polynomials in the numerator and denominator, where \(N(s)\) and \(D(s)\) represent the system's zeros and poles, respectively. The discussion also clarifies the transition from \(\tau_1\) to \(\tau_3\) and the significance of \(\zeta_3\) in the numerator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transfer functions in control systems
  • Familiarity with circuit analysis concepts
  • Knowledge of polynomial expressions in engineering
  • Basic grasp of complex frequency variables (s and jω)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of transfer functions in circuit analysis
  • Learn about the significance of poles and zeros in system stability
  • Explore the implications of damping ratios (\(\zeta\)) in control systems
  • Review infinite series expansions in engineering contexts
USEFUL FOR

Circuit engineers, control system designers, and students studying electrical engineering who seek to deepen their understanding of transfer function notation and its applications in circuit analysis.

FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
Just a quick question about some notation used in my book.

The proper form of the transfer function used in my book is as follows:

[tex]\bar H(j\omega) = \frac{K_0(j\omega)^{\pm N} (1+j\omega\tau_1)(1+2\zeta_3(j\omega\tau_3)+(j\omega\tau_3)^2)\cdot\cdot\cdot }{(1+j\omega \tau_a)(1+2\zeta_b(j \omega \tau_b)+(j \omega \tau_b)^2 )\cdot \cdot \cdot}[/tex]

I'm kinda just being picky here, but I would like to understand the convention that they used.

Why the jump from [itex]\tau_1[/itex] to [itex]\tau_3[/itex], the choice of starting with [itex]\zeta_3[/itex] in the numerator. Just curious if someone could shed some light on this.

Thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this in circuits, controls, vibrations...? What is the topic?

By the looks of it, it's a formulation from an infinite series.
 
Woops I forgot about this post :blushing:

Sorry, I should have specified where this came from. This is from a basic circuit engineering course, specfically from the book: "Basic Engineering Circuit Analsysis" 8th Edition, Irwin/Nelms.

It looks like an expansion of some sort. The lecture notes have been very good, so I haven't been reading chapters like I typically do, just skimming them...it looks like I missed a page or two.

[tex]\bar H(s) = \frac{N(s)}{D(s)}=\frac{K_0(s-z_1)(s-z_2)\cdot \cdot \cdot(s-z_m)}{(s-p_1)(s-p_2)\cdot\cdot\cdot(s-p_n)}[/tex] (1)

where:
[tex]s= j\omega[/tex]
[tex]N(s) =[/tex] a polynomial of degree m
[tex]D(s) =[/tex] a polynomial of degree n

Also, it says that in general (1) can be expressed in the form that I gave in the OP. Hope that helps clear things up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K