Transfer functions of active filters with Amplification

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the transfer functions for two circuits involving active filters with amplification. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of the transfer functions, Bode plots, and the implications of circuit configurations on gain and phase shifts. The focus includes both theoretical derivations and practical considerations related to circuit behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to derive the transfer function for a low-pass active filter, suggesting a potential divider approach using impedances.
  • Another participant points out the need to specify that the resistance in the frequency equation is actually R2.
  • A different participant provides an alternative expression for the transfer function using Laplace transforms and suggests substituting s = jω for Bode analysis.
  • There is a discussion about the phase shift at DC and the behavior of the circuit at cutoff frequency, with some participants noting the phase shift will be -45 degrees at -3 dB.
  • One participant mentions that the DC gain for the first circuit is set by the resistors R1 and R2, emphasizing the negative sign in the gain expression.
  • Another participant presents the transfer function for a second circuit, suggesting it behaves similarly to the first in terms of Bode plot characteristics.
  • There is confusion regarding the presence of an R3 resistor in the second circuit, leading to questions about the correct gain expression.
  • Participants clarify that the DC gain for the first circuit should be G = R2/R3, while for the second circuit it is G = R2/R1, with emphasis on the negative gain for the second circuit.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct gain expressions and the presence of resistors in the circuits. There is no consensus on the correct implementation of the gain function or the transfer functions for the circuits, indicating ongoing debate and uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the importance of accurately identifying circuit components and their roles in determining gain. There are unresolved questions regarding the correct application of circuit analysis techniques and the implications for Bode plot sketches.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners interested in active filter design, circuit analysis, and the application of transfer functions in electrical engineering.

topcat123
Messages
77
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Derive the transfer function for both circuits \frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}} sketch Bode plots for each circuit (amplitude and phase)

Homework Equations


Z_c=\frac{1}{j{\omega}C}~and~{\omega}_C=\frac{1}{RC}

The Attempt at a Solution


We can treat this as a potential divider using the impedances of the resister and caps.
using the Equation for the first circuit (Low pass active)\frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}}=\frac{Z_c}{Z_R+Z_C}Z_R=R
sustituting for ZC and ZR

\frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}}=\frac{\frac{1}{j{\omega}C}}{R+\frac{1}{j{\omega}C}}Multiply though by j{\omega}C gives\frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}}=\frac{1}{j{\omega}RC+1}
substituting for RC with wC
\frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}}=\frac{1}{j\frac{\omega}{\omega_C}+1}

I am not sure how to implement the gain function, I think it is just a case of multiplying by
G=\frac{R_2}{R_1}
as this is negative feed back \frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}}=\frac{-G}{j\frac{\omega}{\omega_C}+1}
Am I on the right lines.
As for the BODE plot when the filter is at cutoff frequance the phase shift will be -45 deg at -3dB with a roll of of 20dB per dec?

All help will be apreciated
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • High.JPG
    High.JPG
    7.3 KB · Views: 469
  • Low.JPG
    Low.JPG
    7.6 KB · Views: 592
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method looks okay for the first circuit. You should specify that the R in your ωC is actually R2.

Take care with your Bode and phase plots. The 3 dB point will be 3 dB down from the maximum gain (low frequency gain). The phase shift will be 45 degrees from the low frequency phase (and it's a negative gain circuit so near DC the phase shift is...?).
 
HighJPG:

ZR2,C1 = ZR2 || ZC1 = R2*(1/sC1) / (R2+1/sC1) = R2 / (sC1R2+1)

ZR1 = R1

Vout/Vin = -ZR2,C1 / ZR1 = -R2 / ( sC1R2R1 + R1 )

If you are not familiar with Laplace, just substitute s = jω as for sinusoidal signal ( Bode ).
 
Last edited:
gneill said:
The phase shift will be 45 degrees from the low frequency phase (and it's a negative gain circuit so near DC the phase shift is...?).

At DC the phase shift is 0 deg 0dB? and wc -45 deg -180 deg at about -40dB?
 
topcat123 said:
At DC the phase shift is 0 deg 0dB? and wc -45 deg -180 deg at about -40dB?

At DC the circuit looks like a standard inverting amplifier. It has a gain set by the resistors R1 and R2:

##\frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}} = - \frac{R_2}{R_1}##

Note carefully the negative sign!
 
Circuit 2 also a low frequency pass (integrator)
the gain is\frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}}=\frac{-Z}{R_1}
z=\frac{X_CR_2}{X_C+R_2}~~as~~X_C=\frac{1}{j{\omega}C}
Z=\frac{\frac{1}{j{\omega}C}{R_2}} {\frac{1}{j{\omega}C}+{R_2}}
multiplying throgh by jwC.
Z=\frac{R_2}{1+j{\omega}CR_2}
the gain is\frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}}=\frac{-Z}{R_1}=\frac{1}{R_1}*-R_2*\frac{1}{1+j{\omega}CR_2}=\frac{-R_2}{R_1}\frac{1}{1+j{\omega}CR_2}
and as G=\frac{R_2}{R_1}
then \frac{-G}{1+j{\omega}CR_2}
This gives the same first order TF as the circuit before I believe it wil has the same BODE plot too?

As there are no values give how can I sketch a BODE plot for the Gain
gneill said:
VoutVin=−R2R1
 
For the second circuit, I'd find the expression for the DC gain first. The feedback path is divided (R2 and R3), so the gain won't be so simple as a ratio of R2/R1.

A sketch of a bode plot doesn't need to have accurate values. Just label significant features (like the corner frequency) with the appropriate expression from your derivations. That said you can always pick some typical part values and use the result to find the general shape as a basis for your sketch.
 
gneill said:
For the second circuit, I'd find the expression for the DC gain first. The feedback path is divided (R2 and R3), so the gain won't be so simple as a ratio of R2/R1.

There is no R3 in the second circuit?
I may be getting mixed up somewhere.

Is the TF for the first circuit ok?
Where have I gone wrong with the second?

thanks for all your help
gneill
 
Your second image:
low-jpg.108798.jpg


Definitely an R3 in there!

Your first circuit TF work looks okay.
 
  • #10
I see the confusion.
fig.1(a) and fig.1(b) the above fig is what i am referring to as the first circuit (fig.1(a)) and the second (fig.1(b))
I should have used the correct idents from the beginning sorry.

So in the DC gain for fig.1(a) should be G=\frac{R_2}{R_3}
topcat123 said:
I am not sure how to implement the gain function, I think it is just a case of multiplying by
G=R2R1​
This is wrong mabe a typo in post " #1"

and the DC gain for fig.1(b) isG=\frac{R_2}{R_1}
 
  • #11
topcat123 said:
I see the confusion.
fig.1(a) and fig.1(b) the above fig is what i am referring to as the first circuit (fig.1(a)) and the second (fig.1(b))
I should have used the correct idents from the beginning sorry.
Ah. Well that's a horse of a different color then :smile:
So in the DC gain for fig.1(a) should be G=\frac{R_2}{R_3}
You want to check that. Have you analyzed the circuit? Note that since no current can flow into the op-amp inputs, the junction of the R2~R3 divider must be equal to Vin (essentially no input current so no potential drop across R1).
and the DC gain for fig.1(b) isG=\frac{R_2}{R_1}
The gain should be negative for fig.1(b).
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K