Understanding Twice Differentiable Functions with f''(x) ≥ 0

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around properties of twice continuously differentiable functions, specifically focusing on conditions where the second derivative is non-negative. The original poster expresses confusion regarding two statements related to these functions and their implications for convexity and inequalities.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the condition f''(x) ≥ 0, questioning the nature of the function f and its convexity. There is an inquiry into the definition of convex functions and how it relates to the provided statements.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed that the condition implies convexity, while others are seeking a deeper understanding of the definitions and proofs involved. The conversation indicates a mix of exploration and clarification without reaching a definitive conclusion on the original poster's questions.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates a lack of clarity on how to approach proving the statements in their exam context, suggesting a need for foundational understanding of the concepts involved.

stukbv
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1. if a function is twice continuously differentiable with f''(x) >= 0 for all real values of x then

(f(-x) + f(x))/2 >= f(0) ?


2. if a function is twice continuously differentiable with f''(x) >= 0 for all real values of x then
tf(x) + (1-t)f(y) >= f(tx+(1-t)y)
for all real values of x and y and for 0<=t<=1


I am really confused with these types of questions and to how to attempt them in my exam.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If [itex]f''(x) \geq 0[/itex] for all real x, then what kind of function is f?
 
convex?
 
stukbv said:
convex?

Yes. Now what's the definition of a convex function?
 
No idea?
 
stukbv said:
No idea?

Look it up?
 
when i try and look it up it just keeps telling me exactly what part 2 says, i know its true but i need to prove it you see.
 
Yes, the conclusion of part 2 is exactly the definition of a convex function.

So part 2 is asking, true or false, f''(x) >= 0 for all x implies that f is convex. This is true, and the proof is a standard one which should be in your calculus book under "second derivative test" or something similar.

What about part 1?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K