Understanding Units of Force (Newtons and Pascals)

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomtomtom1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Units
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the relationship between units of force, specifically Newtons and Pascals. The unit of force, Newton, is defined as kg * m / s^2, confirming that 560 kg * m / s^2 equates to 560 Newtons. Additionally, the unit kg/s^2 is identified as the unit of a spring constant, not directly representing Newtons or Pascals. The context of the units is emphasized as crucial for accurate interpretation in various applications, such as calculating forces in engineering scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly force and pressure.
  • Familiarity with SI units, specifically Newtons and Pascals.
  • Knowledge of spring constants and their applications in mechanics.
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate unit conversions in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Newtons in physics.
  • Learn about Pascal's principle and its significance in fluid mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of spring constants and their role in Hooke's Law.
  • Investigate unit conversions and dimensional analysis in engineering contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers, and anyone involved in mechanics or material science who seeks to deepen their understanding of force units and their applications in real-world scenarios.

tomtomtom1
Messages
160
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
Understanding Units of Force (Newtons and Pascals)
Relevant Equations
1) Kg * m / s^2
2) kg/s^2
Hi all

I am trying to get my head around some units of force.

1) I have units of:-
Kg * m / s^2

Am I correct in thinking that these are units of Newtons.

So if I had 560Kg * m / s^2, then can I say 560 Newtons - would this be correct?

2) Secondly I have units of:-
kg/s^2

I have no idea what these units are they pascals or Newtons ?

Can someone shed any light?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tomtomtom1 said:
Homework Statement: Understanding Units Of Force (Newtons and Pascals)
Homework Equations: 1) Kg * m / s^2
2) kg/s^2

Hi all

I am trying to get my head around some units of force.

1) I have units of:-
Kg * m / s^2

Am I correct in thinking that these are units of Newtons.

So if I had 560Kg * m / s^2, then can I say 560 Newtons - would this be correct?

2) Secondly I have units of:-
kg/s^2

I have no idea what these units are they pascals or Newtons ?

Can someone shed any light?

Thank you.

Yes, Newtons are the SI unit for force ##kg \cdot m/s^2##.

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton_(unit)

The pascal is a unit of pressure, which is ##N/m^2 = kg/(m \cdot s^2)##

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal_(unit)

The units ##kg/s^2## would be the units of a spring constant, ##k##. The force of an elastic medium may be proportional to the length it is stretched: ##F = kx##.
 
Often units of force don't get simplified the way you have done. So a Newton is a unit of force, yes. But you won't often see that as kg m / s^2, though of course you could.

Similarly, a spring's force constant won't usually be listed as kg/s^2. Rather it will be N/m, meaning Newtons per meter.

On the other hand, you should be thinking about these things when you do a calculation. If the units come out to kg/s^2, the context may help you figure out what that is supposed to be. If you are dealing with springs, you probably want a force per distance.

But the context is going to be important. Imagine you were dealing with a bridge across a span. You might need to work out the weight of the bridge per meter of bridge. Not the mass, but the weight. So that would be Newtons per meter. But if you simplify the units, that's kg/s^2. Which does not instantly *look* like a weight per meter. Then the context reminds you it's Newtons per meter.
 
DEvens said:
Often units of force don't get simplified the way you have done. So a Newton is a unit of force, yes. But you won't often see that as kg m / s^2, though of course you could.

Similarly, a spring's force constant won't usually be listed as kg/s^2. Rather it will be N/m, meaning Newtons per meter.

On the other hand, you should be thinking about these things when you do a calculation. If the units come out to kg/s^2, the context may help you figure out what that is supposed to be. If you are dealing with springs, you probably want a force per distance.

But the context is going to be important. Imagine you were dealing with a bridge across a span. You might need to work out the weight of the bridge per meter of bridge. Not the mass, but the weight. So that would be Newtons per meter. But if you simplify the units, that's kg/s^2. Which does not instantly *look* like a weight per meter. Then the context reminds you it's Newtons per meter.

Thanks DEvens.

Your correct looking at the context does makes sense.

In fact i calculated kg/s^2 incorrectly, it should be kg *m/s^2 which is a measure of Newtons.

Thank you again.
 
When you have a combination of units that is not one of the standard combinations, it is hard to tell what is going on without a context because there are many ways to get the same resultant units from combining base and named combinations. I have seen all kinds of weird units working in industry. For example, one could make the units under consideration in many different ways:

Newtons per meter: ##\frac{N}{m} = \left[\frac{kg m}{s^2}\right] \cdot \left[\frac{1}{m}\right]= \frac{kg}{s^2}##

Pascal meters: ##Pa \cdot m = \left[\frac{kg}{m s^2}\right] \cdot \left[m\right] = \frac{kg}{s^2}##

Watt seconds per square meter = ##\frac{W \cdot s}{m^2} = \left[\frac{kg m^2}{ s^3}\right] \cdot \left[s\right]\cdot \frac{1}{m^2} = \frac{kg}{s^2}##

So context is important in interpreting any combination. Even the standard combinations have different interpretations. As an example, it was a big "A-ha" moment for me when I realized that pressure can be interpreted as Force per Area or as Energy per Volume. Which is more useful depends on the application.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
888
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K