Understanding Vertical Velocity: A Quick Guide for Scientists

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the vertical velocity of a bowling ball that rolls off a horizontal table. The problem involves concepts from projectile motion and the equations of motion, specifically focusing on how to determine the vertical component of velocity as the ball strikes the ground.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of the equations of motion to find the vertical velocity, questioning which equation is appropriate given the initial conditions and the height of the fall. There is a focus on understanding the independence of horizontal and vertical motion.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided guidance on the equations of motion and clarified the role of acceleration due to gravity. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct application of these equations, with some participants expressing confusion about initial conditions and the correct values to use.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express feelings of frustration and self-doubt regarding their understanding of the material, indicating a potential lack of confidence in their grasp of the concepts involved. There is also mention of missing solutions in textbooks, which adds to the difficulty in resolving the problem.

Elihu5991
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
How do I calculate vertical velocity? I feel very silly for asking this question, as I should know this and is very basic. I don't seem to get it from any of my books and it is the quick,, thus, I can't contact my teacher or friends as I don't have their email or skype. If I can't still work it out, then I will post the question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vertical velocity of what?
What information do you have?
 
Ok. I'll thenpost my question:

A bowling ball of mass 7.50kg traveling at 10.0 m s-1 rolls off a horizontal table 1.00 m high.

*skipping a) as it's done and not posting others as I'm not up to them*

b) What is the vertical velocity of the ball as it strikes the floor?



Thanks in advance :smile:
 
Elihu5991 said:
Ok. I'll thenpost my question:

A bowling ball of mass 7.50kg traveling at 10.0 m s-1 rolls off a horizontal table 1.00 m high.

*skipping a) as it's done and not posting others as I'm not up to them*

b) What is the vertical velocity of the ball as it strikes the floor?



Thanks in advance :smile:


What equations do you know how to use and of them, which do you think you should use here?
 
Well I'm required to use these three Equations of Motion:

v = u + at
s = ut + \frac{1}{2}at^{2}
v^{2} = u^{2} + 2as


This is what I believe I am to use. It's meant to be primarily focused on projectile motion. I believe, correct me if I am wrong, that the first one is for vertical velocity. I do feel that I am wrong as I don't have acceleration nor can I calculate it. The answers in book don't have solutions to follow and the worked examples aren't of much use.

I seriously feel silly for even asking for this, it is simple, yet for some reason ... I'm not getting it ! It's probably a right in my face answer that will give me a silly "Ah-ha" moment. Yet thankyou for your help.
 
Elihu5991 said:
Well I'm required to use these three Equations of Motion:

v = u + at
s = ut + \frac{1}{2}at^{2}
v^{2} = u^{2} + 2as


This is what I believe I am to use. It's meant to be primarily focused on projectile motion. I believe, correct me if I am wrong, that the first one is for vertical velocity. I do feel that I am wrong as I don't have acceleration nor can I calculate it. The answers in book don't have solutions to follow and the worked examples aren't of much use.

I seriously feel silly for even asking for this, it is simple, yet for some reason ... I'm not getting it ! It's probably a right in my face answer that will give me a silly "Ah-ha" moment. Yet thankyou for your help.


Those equations of motion pertain to motion in general, and hold as long as the acceleration is constant. There's no particular equation for vertical velocity as such (but of course, all those equations also apply).

For this problem, realize that:

1) horizontal and vertical motion are independent of each other.

2) vertical velocity starts as zero, and is subjected to a constant acceleration of g downward.

3) the only other quantity you're given is the height through which the ball descends, so use the appropriate equation.
 
okay, I'll explain these equations to you!

The standard notion for this kind of stuff is
v = final velocity
u = initial velocity
s = displacment
a = acceleration
t = time elapsed

These are all vector equations, so these apply for each component of velocity or displacment
The first equation
v=u + at
This tells you that the final velocity is equal to the initial velocity plus a term due to acceleration, which should be expected.

The second equation
s = ut + \frac{1}{2} a t ^2
This equation tells you that the displacement is equal to the initial velocity times time, which again should be expected, plus a term which involves acceleration (once you know yourself some calculus you'll know where the half and the second power come from)

The third equation
v^2=u^2 + 2 a s
Isn't really anything new, it's really just the first two equations
It tells you that the square of the initial velocity is equal to the square of the final velocity plus a term due to acceleration.Now, with what you are told in the question, which of these do you think you should use?
A bowling ball of mass 7.50kg traveling at 10.0 m s-1 rolls off a horizontal table 1.00 m high.

We have an TWO initial velocities here, one is stated explicitly, the other is between the lines, we also have a displacment.
And we're trying to find a final velocity.

Which of these equations do you think will help us with this?
 
Yes, I do get that the other one is 9.8 ms; but the answers say otherwise and I want to know how to get to it. I initially thought the answer was 9.8, it's what made sense.

WAIT, hang on! Would 9.8 go in the acceleration?! So with what we have, it would be the third equation. Yet I have tried this option before, and like before, the answer came out wrong (I did square-root my answer to ensure it was correct).

See people, I do seem silly and your probably face-palming yourselves. Sorry, but I don't know why. I'm sure my teacher taught me correctly.
 
Elihu5991 said:
Yes, I do get that the other one is 9.8 ms; but the answers say otherwise and I want to know how to get to it. I initially thought the answer was 9.8, it's what made sense.

WAIT, hang on! Would 9.8 go in the acceleration?! So with what we have, it would be the third equation. Yet I have tried this option before, and like before, the answer came out wrong (I did square-root my answer to ensure it was correct).

See people, I do seem silly and your probably face-palming yourselves. Sorry, but I don't know why. I'm sure my teacher taught me correctly.

Approximately, g = 9.8 ms^{-2} (note the units). Yes, that's the acceleration.

Use the third equation, but show your working. Then we can see what you're doing wrong.
 
  • #10
v^{2} = 10^{2} + 2x9.8x1

v^{2} = 119.6

\sqrt{119.6}

= 10.94
 
  • #11
Elihu5991 said:
v^{2} = 10^{2} + 2x9.8x1

v^{2} = 119.6

\sqrt{119.6}

= 10.94

The initial *vertical* velocity is zero. So why are you putting u = 10?
 
  • #12
OH MY GOSH

OH MY GOSH

OH MY GOSH

OH MY GOSH

OH MY GOSH

You have no idea how long I have dwelled on this ! Yes, it is sad. * facepalm x100 *

Many blessing for you my friend!

What can I say, I am soooooo relieved.

The answer is correct

HOW CAN I, IN MY RIGHT MIND, EVEN NOT REALISE THAT. I can now finally move on with my work and stay up to speed ... hopefully, this doesn't happen again. THANKYOU SO MUCH

THANKYOU SO MUCH

THANKYOU SO MUCH

P.S it's ok, I'm not crazy no desperate or mad ... I'm just trying to express my gratitude in the limited methods of communication we have access to (ie. text on monitor ... no face-to-face or voice). I have learned well from this crazy dilemma.

By the way - How can I resolve his thread ... yes, another silly question. I can't find the button on the page nor my control panel.
 
Last edited:
  • #13


After all that, a mere "you're welcome" seems somehow inadequate. But you're welcome. :smile:
 
  • #14
Curious3141 said:
After all that, a mere "you're welcome" seems somehow inadequate. But you're welcome. :smile:
You could try:
(You're welcome.)3141
 
  • #15
SammyS said:
You could try:
(You're welcome.)3141

Or I could offer him a nice slice of 3.141.
 
  • #16
Gosh you all are funny ;)

Both shall suffice and I also say them too :D

I got my point across and gratitude ... this is a different circumstance as it felt so SIMPLE yet I could not work it out for someone insane reason -_-
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K