Understanding Wattage of a Blender

  • Thread starter Thread starter geoduck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blender Wattage
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the meaning and implications of the wattage rating of blenders, specifically focusing on how power output relates to motor performance, torque, and speed. Participants explore the technical aspects of power ratings in consumer appliances, including the factors that influence the actual mechanical work done by the motor.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the wattage rating indicates the maximum electrical power drawn from the supply, but the actual mechanical output depends on various factors such as torque and speed.
  • Others argue that the power rating does not provide a complete picture, as it does not account for internal resistance or efficiency losses in the motor.
  • A participant suggests that maximum power delivery occurs when the current is half the start-up current, leading to a discussion about the relationship between voltage, current, and torque.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the utility of the wattage rating, suggesting that measuring actual performance with a multimeter would yield more accurate data.
  • There is a mention that the power rating might serve as a general guide for consumers, indicating that higher wattage could imply better performance, though this is not always the case.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of the wattage rating. Multiple competing views remain regarding its significance and the factors influencing motor performance.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on how manufacturers derive power ratings, the dependence on specific motor geometries, and the absence of efficiency considerations in the power rating.

geoduck
Messages
257
Reaction score
2
If a blender has a power of 800 watts, what does that mean?

Doesn't the power output depend on the torque or speed of the motor, which depends on what you're blending?

A motor that is spinning freely should have no power output (assume superconducting wires), because there is no torque in a freely spinning motor and hence no current through the battery!

A stalled motor also delivers no power output, although a lot of power is burned at the internal source resistance.

Whenever a wattage is specified for a motor, doesn't there need to be a torque or speed specified for that wattage?

Also, what exactly are the design parameters for a blender? It seems you'd want low wire resistance R, so that the start-up torque (the maximum possible torque) is huge V2/R so that you can crush ice. But isn't that all there is? If you can't get R low, then you have to use gears. But what else is there to consider?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For consumer equipment like a blender, I don't think it means much more than "the maximum electrical power taken from the supply will never exceed 800W". As you say, how much of that is converted into useful mechanical work depends on many things.

It might also give you the general idea that an "800W blender" would be more powerful than say a "400W blender". Or at least, that's the message the advertisers might want you to get from it.
 
The rating is for the "Maximum Draw" of the device. There is still internal resistance in the motor coil, even when there is no load. There is also a high load during the acceleration of the drive shaft, as there is a 'load' during that phase. Get yourself an ampmeter and measure the current draw if you really want to see the numbers.
 
dillonjerry said:
The rating is for the "Maximum Draw" of the device.

By maximum draw do you mean maximum current? As you say, the maximum current is at start-up, and is equal to the mains voltage divided by resistance in coil.

I calculated the maximum power delivered by the motor to occur when the current is half the start-up current. Does that sound about right?

V=IR+\epsilon

where V is mains voltage, and \epsilon is the voltage drop across the motor which is a function of only the rotation speed and geometry of coils.

P=I \epsilon=(V-\epsilon)\epsilon/R

Taking the derivative with respect to epsilon and setting it equal to zero, gives maximum power when epsilon is equal to V/2.

When epsilon is equal to V/2, from the first equation I=V/(2R) which is half the start-up current of V/R (since epsilon equals zero when the speed is zero, V=IR at start-up and hence I=V/R)

But for each motor, depending on its geometry, this maximum power (delivered when the current is half the start-up current) occurs at different speeds. For each speed you can associate a torque because torque only depends on the current I, and in:

V=IR+\epsilon

if you know the speed you know \epsilon, and hence I since mains voltage V and coil resistance R are known.

So do all blender makers advertise the highest power deliverable to the motor, even though the highest power might occur at a torque that is not relevant for blending (what you blend determines the torque that your motor will output - you don't determine the torque).
 
I would say, that since you know nothing about how this value was derived from the manufacturer, the only way you are going to get useful data is from a meter. If you really want genuine numbers on this, you are going to have to wire it to a multimeter. I would say that the power rating determines the maximum torque deliverable before damage occurs to the motor. Just a guess . . .
 
The power rating just refers to the power used when the bowl is full and the blender is turned to full speed.

This would not include stall or other rare conditions.

It might be overthinking it a bit to be taking derivatives.

Although it does not include any allowance for efficiency, this power rating is a sort of guide to the buyer in the store who is faced with a confusing array of appliances.
In this case, more power might mean a better appliance, or just a more wasteful one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
78
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K