Understanding Waves, Particles and Probabilities

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics, specifically how the position of a particle is represented by a probability distribution that resembles a wave. Participants clarified that the wave aspect manifests when the wave's width is small, while the particle aspect is observed during interactions. Quantum mechanics (QM) explains this duality through the use of wavefunctions, which encapsulate both particle-like and wave-like behaviors. Notably, some authoritative QM textbooks, such as Griffiths and Sakurai, treat wave-particle duality as a historical concept rather than a fundamental part of the theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Familiarity with wavefunctions in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of classical physics concepts, including particles and waves
  • Awareness of historical experiments like the photoelectric effect and electron diffraction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of wavefunctions in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of the photoelectric effect on wave-particle duality
  • Investigate electron diffraction experiments and their significance in quantum theory
  • Read advanced quantum mechanics textbooks, focusing on interpretations of wave-particle duality
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, quantum mechanics researchers, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of wave-particle duality and its implications in modern physics.

geordief
Messages
224
Reaction score
50
TL;DR
Am I getting close to a basic understanding of probability waves?
In the ongoing quantum interpretations and foundations thread vanahees71 explained to me that the wave particle duality has been explained by the model where the position of a particle is calculated according to a probability distribution traveling in space.

Am I understanding this correctly.The probability distribution has the same shape as a wave and that accounts for the wave part of the wave-particle duality?

And the particle part is when an interaction actually takes place?

Or am I nowhere near understanding this still?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
geordief said:
Am I understanding this correctly.The probability distribution has the same shape as a wave and that accounts for the wave part of the wave-particle duality?
Roughly, yes.
geordief said:
And the particle part is when an interaction actually takes place?
The wave looks like a particle when the width of wave is small. Interaction can be a part of the reason why this happens, but it's not that simple.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and geordief
geordief said:
Summary: Am I getting close to a basic understanding of probability waves?

In the ongoing quantum interpretations and foundations thread vanahees71 explained to me that the wave particle duality has been explained by the model where the position of a particle is calculated according to a probability distribution traveling in space.

Am I understanding this correctly.The probability distribution has the same shape as a wave and that accounts for the wave part of the wave-particle duality?

And the particle part is when an interaction actually takes place?

Or am I nowhere near understanding this still?
Classical physics involves two seemingly different physical things: particles and waves. It was assumed that some things were particles (e.g. electrons) and some things were waves (e.g light).

Then certain experiments were carried out that appeared to show light behaving like a particle (photoelectric effect) and electrons behaving like waves (electron diffraction). This was called wave-particle duality.

QM explains wave-particle duality by modelling an electron using a wavefunction. This single model explained both its particle-like and wave-like behaviour.

QM itself doesn't have wave-particle duality as part of the theory. And, indeed, some popular QM textbooks (e.g. Griffiths and Sakurai) either mention it only as a historical footnote or not at all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and geordief

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K