Understanding why an angle is the same as another one?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cherryrocket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding why the angle that the weight of a block makes with the parallel force on an inclined plane is the same as the angle of the inclined plane itself. The context includes conceptual clarification related to forces and angles in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references a teacher's explanation that the angle of the weight with the parallel force equals the angle of the inclined plane, suggesting a connection to similar angles.
  • Another participant proposes a geometric reasoning involving the rotation of coordinate systems, explaining that the angle between the tangential and horizontal axes must equal the angle between the normal and vertical axes due to the preservation of orthogonality during rotation.
  • A third participant reinforces the idea by noting that both angles are part of right triangles, implying they must be the same.
  • A later reply expresses understanding and appreciation for the explanations provided by others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to agree on the reasoning behind the equality of the angles, with no significant disagreement noted in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not address potential limitations or assumptions regarding the conditions under which the angles are considered equal, nor does it explore any mathematical derivations in detail.

cherryrocket
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t88/liliananas/FORCES.jpg

My teacher told us that on an inclined plane, the angle the weight of a block makes with the parallel force is the same as the angle of the inclined plane, in this case 29°. Why is that? I know it has to do something with similar angles, such as those in the shape of a Z or F, but I can't find the shape to justify these angles. Thanks for your help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of two rigid coordinate systems, the one characterised as horizontal&vertical, the other as tangential&normal.

Now, let's start out with a copy of the horizontal&vertical system, lying on top of itself.
Rotate the upper system, so that its previous "horizontal direction" now coincides with the "tangential direction".
But then, the previous "vertical direction" must now coincide with the "normal direction", otherwise, orthogonality of the two axes has not been preserved.

But, and this is the insight to be drawn directly relevant to your question:
Therefore, the angle the TANGENTIAL axis makes with the horizontal axis, must be the same angle as the angle between the NORMAL axis and the vertical axis! It is a single rotation that has been made, and the magnitude of that rotation is given by the angle of how much BOTH axes has been rotated with respect to the "standard" horizontal&vertical coordinate system.
 
16hrqlk.png


Hopefully that's clear enough (I just added to your drawing). Since they're both right angle triangles, the angle must be the same.
 
Hey I finally get it! Thanks alridno and mace2!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K