Understanding Work and Energy Transfer: The Relationship and Implications

  • Thread starter Thread starter urtalkinstupid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
Click For Summary
Work is defined as the transfer of energy through the application of force over a distance, calculated as the product of force and distance. If no movement occurs, no work is done, leading to the question of energy output despite exertion. Scenarios illustrate that while a person may exert energy without moving an object, the work equation indicates zero output, raising questions about energy conservation. The discussion also touches on gravitational forces, noting that while they exert influence, they do not perform work in the traditional sense as defined by the equation. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of work, energy, and their interrelations in physical systems.
  • #211
Type of cliff would include it's height from the ground (or core). I've already said that you would have to state the point at which y-position is 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #212
"UrTalk" was saying that ON the cliff, the ball has no potential energy because it's still touching the ground, OFF the cliff it does have potential energy because it has a distance to reach ground

Tom is saying that you're always measuring potential energy to the bottom of the cliff, even if the ball is sitting on the GROUND at the Edge of said cliff.

just clearing up where people are arguing from (which really isn't part of an argument in the first place, i guess we need to re-focus)
 
  • #213
No, that is not what I was saying. Try again.
 
  • #214
urtalkinstupid said:
Type of cliff would include it's height from the ground (or core).

And as I keep telling you, the height from the ground is all you need to know. You do not need to know anything about the cliff at all. If you took a picture of the bowling ball with a long measuring stick in the background and told me the mass of the ball, and edited out the cliff, I could still tell you what the GPE is with the ground as the datum.

I don't know how to make it any clearer than that that the cliff is purely incidental to the setup.

I've already said that you would have to state the point at which y-position is 0.

You're sending mixed signals then, because the "real definition of PE" by itself does not include the datum.
 
  • #215
urtalkinstupid said:
No, that is not what I was saying. Try again.

That's exactly what you were saying.
 
  • #216
So, is it the type of cliff that is 385m above ground or the type that is 386.3m above the ground?

I simply said that to mess with you people...wow, you people are freaking serious.
 
  • #217
urtalkinstupid said:
I simply said that to mess with you people...wow, you people are freaking serious.
Okay, that's enough for me. Wave bye-bye.

- Warren
 
  • #218
urtalkinstupid said:
I simply said that to mess with you people...wow, you people are freaking serious.

No, you said it because you had a serious misconception about gravitational potential energy, which is why I corrected you. But rather than admit the error and thank me (as I would do in the extremely unlikely event that the shoe is ever on the other foot), you backpeddaled like a know-it-all brat who couldn't possibly make a mistake.
 
  • #219
urtalkinstupid said:
I simply said that to mess with you people...wow, you people are freaking serious.
Interesting catch-22 you put yourself in there: on the one hand you could admit being wrong, learn something and gain our respect, on the other hand you could admit being a troll and a menace to this forum. Interesting choice you made. But it does simplify our job somewhat...
 
  • #220
i knew they were trolls from day one, but nooooo. no one listens to me...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
16K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K