Understanding Work in Falling Bodies: Gravity, Energy, and Convention

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of work done by gravity on a falling body, specifically addressing the formula for work, W = mgh. It clarifies that when a body falls, the work is done by the gravitational force on the body, resulting in a gain of kinetic energy. The confusion arises from the interpretation of work as either being done by the body or on the body, with the consensus being that gravity does positive work on the falling body. The calculations presented confirm that the work done by gravity is positive when the body falls, while the work done against gravity when lifting the body is also positive, leading to potential energy gain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the work-energy theorem
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, specifically integration
  • Concept of gravitational potential energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Learn about gravitational potential energy and its applications
  • Explore the implications of negative work in physics
  • Investigate the role of coordinate systems in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of work and energy in gravitational systems.

mpkannan
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
When a body falls from a height (h) under gravity,the work involved is mgh. How do you describe this work? Is it 'work done by the force (gravity) on the body' or 'work done by the body'. The confusion is, if work is done on the body the body gains energy; but if work is done by the body the body loses energy. What is the standard convention?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mpkannan said:
When a body falls from a height (h) under gravity,the work involved is mgh. How do you describe this work? Is it 'work done by the force (gravity) on the body' or 'work done by the body'. The confusion is, if work is done on the body the body gains energy; but if work is done by the body the body loses energy. What is the standard convention?

Not necessarily so. If the work is negative, the body loses energy.
 
mpkannan said:
When a body falls from a height (h) under gravity,the work involved is mgh. How do you describe this work? Is it 'work done by the force (gravity) on the body' or 'work done by the body'. The confusion is, if work is done on the body the body gains energy; but if work is done by the body the body loses energy. What is the standard convention?
Since gravity acts on the body, we're talking about work done on the body, not by the body. That work happens to be positive as the body falls, since the force and the displacement are in the same direction. (If the body were moving upward, the work done by gravity would be negative.)
 
Doc Al said:
Since gravity acts on the body, we're talking about work done on the body, not by the body. That work happens to be positive as the body falls, since the force and the displacement are in the same direction. (If the body were moving upward, the work done by gravity would be negative.)

Pl. see the following calcultions and advise me on the error involved:

(1) I consider a Cart coordinate system (drawn as per the right hand thumb rule) with +ve Z axis pointing upwards. Now, consider a body falling from z=h to z=0. The work involved is:

Integral (from h to 0) of [-mg dz] (-mg, because the force is acting downwards). The answer is mgh. Is this not the work done by the body, since it loses this much energy on fall? If so why it is not negative?

(2) If I raise the body from 0 to h, the work done on the the body is:

Integral (from 0 to h) of [mg dz] (here force applied is equal and opposite to gravity; so +mg). The asnwer is mgh. The body gains this much energy and stores it as its potential energy.

Why I am not getting opposite signs for the 2 types of work involved?
 
(1) This is work done by the gravity on the body, not by the body. The body gains kinetic energy . Work done = gain in KE (this is work energy theorem) The integral is positive , if you have done your integration correctly.
(2) This is the wrong integral , as the gravity is still downward so it should be Integral (from 0 to h) -mg dz, and the integral this time is negative. So there is a loss of kinetic energy.
 
mpkannan said:
(1) I consider a Cart coordinate system (drawn as per the right hand thumb rule) with +ve Z axis pointing upwards. Now, consider a body falling from z=h to z=0. The work involved is:

Integral (from h to 0) of [-mg dz] (-mg, because the force is acting downwards). The answer is mgh. Is this not the work done by the body, since it loses this much energy on fall? If so why it is not negative?
No, it's not the work done by the body. Gravity (-mg) acts on the body.

(2) If I raise the body from 0 to h, the work done on the the body is:

Integral (from 0 to h) of [mg dz] (here force applied is equal and opposite to gravity; so +mg). The asnwer is mgh. The body gains this much energy and stores it as its potential energy.
Good.

Why I am not getting opposite signs for the 2 types of work involved?
Positive work was done in each case. In case 1, gravity did the work; in case 2, you did the work.

In case 2 the work done by gravity (not you) is negative, but you didn't calculate that.
 
My apologies for the (2) as I have not noticed that you are calculating the work done by hand and not work done by gravity.
So yes, the work is integral from 0 to z (mg dz).
In both cases, the work is positive because they share a common thing:
The force is in the same direction as the displacement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K