Unfamiliar algebra within L'Hopital

  • Thread starter Thread starter LearninDaMath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra l'hopital
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the limit of the expression (e^(2x) - 1)^(x) as x approaches 0 from the positive side, with a focus on the algebraic manipulation involved in applying L'Hôpital's rule.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the factoring of e^(2x) from the denominator and its implications for simplifying the limit expression. Questions arise about the reasoning behind such algebraic manipulations and the conditions under which they are appropriate.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the algebraic steps involved in the limit evaluation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the simplification process and the rationale for avoiding unnecessary differentiation. Multiple interpretations of the algebraic manipulation are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on recognizing opportunities for simplification in similar limit problems, as well as the challenges that may arise in different contexts. The discussion reflects a learning process without reaching a definitive conclusion.

LearninDaMath
Messages
295
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[itex]\stackrel{lim}{x\rightarrow}0^{+}[/itex] ([itex]e^{2x}-1)^{x}[/itex]

At the step of dividing by e^x, how does that algebra work?

lhopitals.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
e^(2x) was factored out from the denominator. In the step right before the blue box, we can factor out e^(2x) from (e^(2x) - 1) so we have [e^(2x)](1 - (1/e^(2x))) = [e^(2x)](1 - e^(-2x)):

[itex]\frac{e^{2x}}{e^{2x} - 1} = \frac{e^{2x}}{e^{2x}(1 - \frac{1}{e^{2x}})} = \frac{1}{1 - e^{-2x}}[/itex].
 
Thanks stripes, appreciate the illustration with the latex reference as well.

I suppose that the reason for factoring out and cancelling away e^2x from this rational function is to avoid having to do an unnecessary product rule (and or chain rule) when applying l'hospital's for the second time. Would this be right?

For future problems similar to this one, what should I be thinking when doing these problems so as to notice when something can be factored out in order to make the next steps easier? Should I just look for similar terms in the numerator and denominator, and if there are, just go ahead and cancel them away before proceeding to any next steps?
 
Last edited:
Yes, doing this eliminates the need for the chain rule in the numerator, so by cancelling the e^(2x), we are simplifying the numerator, and completely eliminating the denominator (i.e., turning the denominator to 1), and thereby making the entire expressing non-indeterminate form.

The best thing to do is to try to turn the expression into a rational one (a ratio of two expressions), and then trying to simplify the numerator if necessary. Sometimes you will be able to take the derivative of the top and bottom easily, but when you cannot, then try to manipulate the expression a little bit in your favor. Look for similar terms, anything that can lead to an expression that is easier to work with.

Unfortunately, depending on the problem, this might be easier said than done. But perseverance is key!
 
Thanks, appreciate your help and advice. I will continue to persevere.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K