1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Uniform charge across a rod, Professor couldn't answer

  1. Sep 21, 2008 #1
    Alright, well I wanted to see what help I could get here, my professor had assigned this problem and when someone in class asked a question, he started doing it on the board and after using ~15min of class time decided there was an issue with the problem. The problem got progressively harder (which leads me to believe he must have made a mistake) and he ended up deciding we don't have to do it, but i'm interested in getting it done anyway.

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    "A rod of length L has a total charge Q uniformly distributed alone its length. The rod lies along the x axis with its center at the origin. (a) What is the electric potential as a function of position along the x axis for x > L/2? (b) Show that for x >> L/2, your result reduces to that due to a point charge Q.

    2. Relevant equations

    V = int|kdq/r
    dq = λdx
    λ = Q/L
    r = x0 - x

    3. The attempt at a solution

    Well what the problem was when we got to (b). Which after setting up the equation we ended up with

    [tex] k\lambda\int_{-L/2}^{L/2}\frac {dx} {x_0-x}) [/tex]

    where after substitution we get

    [tex] k\lambda\int_{-L/2}^{L/2}ln(x_0-x) [/tex]

    but since there's units (meters) for x, it can't be run through a transcendental function, then I got lost here, but with more substitution we ended up with

    [tex] V = k\lambdaln\frac {x_0-1/2} {x_0+1/2} [/tex]

    then when the problem got going, it expanded and expanded and didn't get any simplification going, which is odd for a textbook question. I guess it's more of needing a check with the math work done in the problem?
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 21, 2008 #2

    What you've done looks pretty good, but after subbing in the limits from the integral on this line:

    [tex] \frac { \lambda } { 4 \pi \epsilon_o} ( ln (x_o + L/2) - ln (x_o - L/2) ) [/tex]

    instead of combining the logs (using [tex] ln(A) - ln (B) = ln (A/B) [/tex]) like you've done on the next line, why not factorise out an x_o in each log? Then you can pull the x_o out of the log by using the log rule ln (AB) = ln A + ln B. Something like this:

    [tex] \frac { \lambda } { 4 \pi \epsilon_o} ( ln (x_o) - ln (1 + \frac{L}{2x_o}) - ln(x_o) - ln (x_o - \frac{L}{2x_o}) ) [/tex]

    Notice how the [tex] ln(x_o) [/tex] cancels.

    Here's the trick now though. Try expanding each of the logs to O^2 in terms of a taylor series. If you've done it right, you'll hopefully get some canceling and be left with a an equation which you can replace the charge density and length by the total charge. You're final equation should look like this:

    [tex] \frac { Q } { 4 \pi \epsilon_o x_o} [/tex]

    Hope this helps :-)
  4. Sep 21, 2008 #3


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    For starters I'd use [tex]x'[/tex] to represent the position of the source charge, and [tex]x[/tex] to represent the field point along the x-axis. Then Coulomb's Law giives:

    [tex]V(x)=k \lambda \int_{-L/2}^{L/2} \frac{dx'}{|x-x'|} = -k \lambda ln \left( |x-x'| \right) |_{-L/2}^{L/2} = -k \lambda ln \left( \frac{|x-L/2|}{|x+L/2|} \right) = k \lambda ln \left( \frac{|x+L/2|}{|x-L/2|} \right)[/tex]

    For [tex] x> L/2, \quad |x-L/2|=x-L/2, \quad |x+L/2|=x+L/2 [/tex]

    So, your solution for (a) is:

    [tex]V(x)=k \lambda ln \left( \frac{x+L/2}{x-L/2} \right)[/tex]

    Now for (b), expand the log in a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercator_series" [Broken]:

    [tex] V(x)=k \lambda ln \left( \frac{x+L/2}{x-L/2} \right) =k \lambda ln \left( \frac{1+\frac{L}{2x}}{1-\frac{L}{2x}} \right) = k \lambda ln \left( 1+\frac{L}{2x} \right) - k \lambda ln \left( 1-\frac{L}{2x} \right) \approx k \lambda \left( \frac{L}{2x} - \frac{L^2}{8x^2} \right) - k \lambda \left( - \frac{L}{2x} - \frac{L^2}{8x^2} \right)=k \frac{ \lambda L}{x} = k \frac{Q}{x}[/tex]
    Last edited by a moderator: May 3, 2017
  5. Sep 22, 2008 #4
    That works gabbagabbahey :) Thanks for the help to you two.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook