Uniform Convergence: Showing Continuous & Uniformly Continuous

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of continuity and uniform continuity in the context of real-valued functions. The original poster presents a problem from a textbook that involves showing the equivalence of pointwise convergence of shifted functions to continuity and uniform convergence to uniform continuity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish the continuity of a function based on the pointwise convergence of its shifted versions. They express uncertainty regarding the uniform continuity part of the problem and seek guidance on applying the epsilon-delta definition.
  • Some participants inquire about the definition of uniform continuity and suggest that relevant definitions should be included in the discussion.
  • Others discuss the relationship between continuity and uniform continuity, referencing definitions and the implications of convergence in the context of sequences.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring definitions and clarifying concepts related to continuity and uniform continuity. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of definitions, but no consensus or resolution has been reached regarding the original poster's concerns about part (b) of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of a specific definition of uniform continuity in the original poster's textbook, which may be contributing to the confusion in addressing part (b) of the problem. There is also mention of the need to convert mathematical notation for clarity in the discussion.

mattmns
Messages
1,129
Reaction score
5
Here is the question from the book:
----------
Let [itex]f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}[/itex] be a function. For any [itex]a\in \mathbb{R}[/itex], let [itex]f_a :\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}[/itex] be the shifted function [itex]f_a(x):=f(x-a)[/itex].(a) Show that [itex]f[/itex] is continuous if and only if, whenever [itex](a_n)_{n=0}^{\infty}[/itex] is a sequence of real numbers which converges to zero, the shifted functions [itex]f_{a_n}[/itex] converge pointwise to [itex]f[/itex].

(b) Show that [itex]f[/itex] is uniformly continuous if and only if, whenever [itex](a_n)_{n=0}^{\infty}[/itex] is a sequence of real numbers which converges to zero, the shifted functions [itex]f_{a_n}[/itex] converge uniformly to [itex]f[/itex].---------
[itex](\Rightarrow)[/itex] Let [itex]x_0 \in \mathbb{R}[/itex]. Suppose [itex]f[/itex] is continuous. That is, given [itex]\epsilon > 0[/itex] there exists [itex]\delta > 0[/itex] such that if [itex]|x-x_0| < \delta[/itex] then [itex]|f(x)-f(x_0)| < \epsilon[/itex].Let [itex]x_n = x_0 - a_n[/itex]. So given [itex]\delta > 0[/itex] there exists [itex]N' > 0[/itex] such that [itex]|x_n - x_0|< \delta[/itex] for all [itex]n > N'[/itex].

Given [itex]\epsilon' > 0[/itex] take [itex]\epsilon = \epsilon'[/itex], and take [itex]N = N'[/itex].

So by the continuity of [itex]f[/itex] we get that [itex]|x_n - x_0| < \delta[/itex] for all [itex]n>N' = N[/itex].

Thus, [itex]|f(x_n) - f(x_0)| < \epsilon = \epsilon'[/itex].

But, [itex]f(x_n) = f(x_0-a_n) = f_{a_n}(x_0)[/itex] for all [itex]n>N[/itex].

So we have [itex]|f_{a_n}(x_0) - f(x_0)| < \epsilon[/itex] for all [itex]n>N[/itex].Thus [itex]f_{a_n}[/itex] converges pointwise to [itex]f[/itex].
[itex](\Leftarrow)[/itex] Suppose given [itex]a_n \to 0[/itex] that [itex]f_{a_n}[/itex] converges pointwise to [itex]f[/itex]. Given [itex]x_0[/itex] take a sequence [itex]x_n[/itex] which converges to [itex]x_0[/itex]. That is, [itex]a_n = x_0 - x_n \to 0[/itex].

Since [itex]f_n[/itex] converges pointwise to [itex]f[/itex], given [itex]\epsilon > 0[/itex] there is some [itex]N>0[/itex] such that [itex]|f_{a_n}(x_0) - f(x_0)| < \epsilon[/itex] for all [itex]n>N[/itex].

But, [itex]|f_{a_n}(x_0) - f(x_0)| = |f(x_0 - a_n) - f(x_0)| = |f(x_n) - f(x_0)|[/itex].

Hence, [itex]|f(x_n) - f(x_0)| < \epsilon[/itex] for all [itex]n>N[/itex].

That is, [itex]f(x_n)[/itex] converges to [itex]f(x_0)[/itex]. Thus, [itex]f[/itex] is continuous.----------

I don't think there is anything wrong with any of that (if there is, or you have any comments please say something).

However, I am not too sure about part (b).

The first direction is the same as in part (a), but the other direction I am not sure about.

I have been trying just the basic epsilon-delta definition way (similar to what I did in part (a) with this direction) and not really getting anywhere (which I guess could be expected since we don't have a uniform continuity definition with sequences [at least in our book]).

Any ideas? Thanks!edit... I am converting the $ signs to [itex]'s. Is there an easy (fast and painless) way to do this?[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Copy into notepad, search and replace, using pre-spaces to distinguish opening from closing ones. If it's not too late.
 
What is your definition of uniform continuity? (Please always post relevant definitions)
 
Cool, that worked nicely! Any ideas about the exercise now :smile:

Sorry, I thought that was a standard definition. Here it is:

Uniform Continuity: Let [itex]f:X\to Y[/itex] be a map from one metric space [itex](X,d_X)[/itex] to another [itex](Y,d_Y).[/itex] Then [itex]f[/itex] is uniformly continuous if, for every [itex]\epsilon > 0[/itex], there exists a [itex]\delta > 0[/itex] such that [itex]d_Y(f(x),f(x')) < \epsilon[/itex] whenever [itex]x,x'\in X[/itex] are such that [itex]d_X(x,x')<\delta[/itex].

Here is our book's definition of uniform convergence:

Let [itex](f^{(n)})_{n=1}^{\infty}[/itex] be a sequence of functions from one metric space [itex](X,d_X)[/itex] to another [itex](Y,d_Y)[/itex], and let [itex]f: X\to Y[/itex] be another function. We say that [itex](f^{(n)})_{n=1}^{\infty}[/itex] converges uniformly to [itex]f[/itex] on [itex]X[/itex] if for every [itex]\epsilon > 0[/itex] there exists [itex]N>0[/itex] such that [itex]d_Y(f^{(n)}(x),f(x))<\epsilon[/itex] for every [itex]n>N[/itex] and [itex]x\in X[/itex].
 
Last edited:
It is standard, it's just a lot easier to refer to a definition that's here. Remeber that the definition of continuity in terms of sequences was just a result of the more general definition of limits in terms of sequences, and you should still be able to apply that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K