Apteronotus
- 201
- 0
Hi,
I'm getting some confusing results and can't figure out what is wrong
Suppose we have a uniform field
E=[0,0,E_z] in a dielectric media.
By E=-\nabla\psi we can deduce that \psi(x,y,z)=-z E_z
But, taking the Laplacian
\nabla^2\psi=\frac{\partial^2 (-zE_z)}{\partial z^2}=0
does not match the results of the Poisson equation
\nabla^2\psi=-\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_m \epsilon_o}
what am I missing?
I'm getting some confusing results and can't figure out what is wrong
Suppose we have a uniform field
E=[0,0,E_z] in a dielectric media.
By E=-\nabla\psi we can deduce that \psi(x,y,z)=-z E_z
But, taking the Laplacian
\nabla^2\psi=\frac{\partial^2 (-zE_z)}{\partial z^2}=0
does not match the results of the Poisson equation
\nabla^2\psi=-\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_m \epsilon_o}
what am I missing?