Uniform Field & Poisson equation Mismatch?

Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm getting some confusing results and can't figure out what is wrong
Suppose we have a uniform field

[itex]E=[0,0,E_z][/itex] in a dielectric media.

By [itex]E=-\nabla\psi[/itex] we can deduce that [itex]\psi(x,y,z)=-z E_z[/itex]

But, taking the Laplacian
[itex]\nabla^2\psi=\frac{\partial^2 (-zE_z)}{\partial z^2}=0[/itex]
does not match the results of the Poisson equation
[itex]\nabla^2\psi=-\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_m \epsilon_o}[/itex]

what am I missing?
 
on Phys.org
In the region where the field is uniform, the charge density is zero by Gauss' Law:

[tex]\mathbf{ \nabla } \cdot \mathbf{E} = \frac{ \partial }{ \partial z }E_z = \frac{ \rho }{ \epsilon_0 }[/tex]
 
Ahh I see. So [itex]\rho=0[/itex] is an implicit condition for us to have the uniform field in the first place?
 
Sure, you have one of Maxwell's (microscopic) equations, saying that
[tex]\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{E}=\rho[/tex]
(Heaviside-Lorentz units). This means that a homogeneous electric field necessarily leads to 0 charge density.

Of course, in nature there is no such thing as a global homogeneous field. You get such a field only in a quite unphysical situation. To that end consider the electrostatic potential of a point charge Q at rest at the position [itex]\vec{a}[/itex]. That's of course the corresponding Coulomb potential,
[tex]\Phi(\vec{x})=\frac{Q}{4 \pi |\vec{x}-\vec{a}|}.[/tex]
Now let [itex]|\vec{a}| \gg \vec{x}[/itex]. Then you can expand the potential around [itex]\vec{x}=0[/itex]. You find
[tex]\Phi(\vec{x})=\frac{Q}{4 \pi |\vec{a}|}+\frac{Q \vec{x} \cdot \vec{a}}{4 \pi |\vec{a}|^3}.[/tex]
Now you obtain the potential for a homogeneous field, by letting [itex]|\vec{a}| \rightarrow \infty[/itex] in such a way that [itex]Q \vec{a}/|\vec{a}|^3=-\vec{E}=\text{const}[/itex]. The constant first term you can subtract beforehand. Then you get
[tex]\Phi(\vec{x}) \rightarrow -\vec{x} \cdot \vec{E}.[/tex]
As you see you have to use an infinite charge at infinite distance to make a homogeneous electric field everywhere in space. That's a rather unphysical situation.

In practice you get a quite good approximation of a homogenous electric field between two large charged plates at small distance, in the region in the middle between the plates.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
92
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K