Uniform rod pivoted off-center

  • Thread starter Thread starter natasha13100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod Uniform
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a uniform rod of mass 1.2 kg and length 1.2 m, which is pivoted off-center and released from rest. Participants are tasked with analyzing its rotational inertia, angular speed, and linear speed as it swings downward under the influence of gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of the rod's rotational inertia and discuss the implications of angular speed and acceleration as the rod swings. There are attempts to apply energy conservation principles to find angular and linear speeds at various positions. Some participants question the formulas used for kinetic energy and the distances involved in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided guidance on the correct application of kinetic energy formulas and the use of the parallel axis theorem. There is ongoing exploration of different interpretations regarding the distances from the pivot to the center of mass and the bottom of the rod, indicating a productive dialogue without a clear consensus on the final values.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the definitions of variables and the specific points of interest in the problem, such as the center of mass versus the bottom of the rod. The discussion reflects the complexity of the problem and the need for careful consideration of the setup and assumptions made in the calculations.

natasha13100
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
√ω

Homework Statement


A uniform rod of mass 1.2 kg and length 1.2 m is pivoted in the horizontal position as shown (black point). The rod is at rest and then released. The acceleration due to gravity is g = 9.8 m/s2.
Part 1. Find the rotational inertia of the rod relative to the axis perpendicular to the screen and passing through the pivot point (in kgm2).
Part 2. As the rod swings downward, its angular speed velocity and the magnitude of its angular acceleration, respectively are (increasing, decreasing, staying the same) and (increasing, decreasing, staying the same).
Part 3. What is the angular speed (in rad/s) of the rod as it passes through the vertical position (when end marked B is at the bottom)?
Part 4. What is the linear speed of the bottom end of the rod (marked B) when it passes the vertical position?(in m/s)

Homework Equations


Icm=1/12ml2
Ip=Icm+md2
Ug=mgh
Ui+Ki+Wnoncon=Uf+Kf
Ktrans=1/2mv2
Krot=1/2Iω2
t=Frsinθ
K=Ktrans+Krot
v=ωR

The Attempt at a Solution


Picture/FBD is attached.
Part 1
Ip=1/12m(l)2+m(l/4)2=1/12*1.2*1.22+1.2*.32=.252
Part 2
increasing and decreasing
Part 3
0=1/2mv2+1/2Iω2+mgh where h=-l/4(distance from pivot to cm which will be directly below pivot when the rod is at the bottom of its swing)
mgh=1/2mv2+1/2Iω2=mgh=1/2mω2R2+1/2Iω2=1/2mω2R2+1/2Iω2
1.2(9.8)(.3)=(1/2(1.2)(.3)2+1/2*.252)ω2=(.18)ω2
ω=√(3.528/.18)=4.42718872424
I am not sure if this is correct, but I used l/4 (distance from pivot to center of mass) as R.
Part 4
mgh=1/2mv2+1/2Iω2
2mgh=mv2+Iv2/R2
2(1.2)(9.8)(.3)=(1.2+.252/.32)v2
v=√(7.056/4)=1.32815661727
or v=ωR2=4.42718872424(.3)^2=0.398446985181
Since these two values for v don't match up, I think I'm doing something wrong.
 

Attachments

  • swinging rod.png
    swinging rod.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 772
Physics news on Phys.org
hi natasha13100! :smile:

i think you're using the wrong formula for kinetic energy

it's 1/2mv2 of the c.o.m. plus 1/2Ic.o.mω2 about the c.o.m. :wink:

(which also equals 1/2Ic.o.rω2 about the instantaneous centre of rotation, ie the pivot)
 
What does that mean?
So K=1/2mv^2+1/2(1/12ml^2)w^2=1/2mw^2/(l/2)^2+1/24ml^2w^2=w^2(ml^2/8+ml^2/24)
Uf+Kf=Ui+Ki
0=w^2(ml^2/8+ml^2/24)-mgl/4
mgl/4=w^2(ml^2/8+ml^2/24)
g=w^2(l/2+l/6)
w^2=g/(2l/3)
w=sqrt(3g/2l)
and
v=wl/2=sqrt(3g/2l)l/2
or
K=1/2mv^2+1/2(1/12ml^2)w^2=1/2mv^2+1/2(1/12ml^2)v^2/(l/2)^2=v^2(ml/2+1/6m)
gl/4=v^2(l/2+1/6)
v^2(3l+1)/6=gl/4
v^2=3/(6l+2)
v=sqrt(3/(6l+2))
but v is still off
 
Last edited:
the v in 1/2 mv2 will be (l/4)ω :wink:

(because l24 is the distance from the centre of rotation to the centre of mass)
 
0=w^2(1/2ml^2/16+ml^2/24)-mgl/4
mgl/4=w^2(ml^2/32+ml^2/24)
g=w^2(l/8+l/6)
w^2=24g/(3l+4l)
w=sqrt(24g/7l) which is correct
and
v=lsqrt(24g/7l)/4 but that's not right.
 
Last edited:
natasha13100 said:
0=w^2(1/2ml^2/16+ml^2/24)-mgl/4
mgl/4=w^2(ml^2/32+ml^2/24)
g=w^2(l/8+l/6)
w^2=24g/(3l+4l)
w=sqrt(24g/7l)

looks ok down to here :smile:

(btw, you'd get the same result if you used the parallel axis theorem, and just 1/2 Ic.o.r.ω2 :wink:)
 
1/2Ic.o.r.ω2=mgl/4
c.o.r.=Ic.o.m.+m(l/4)2
Ic.o.m.=1/12ml2
1/2(1/12ml2+m(l/4)22=mgl/4
ω2=g/(l(1/6+1/8))=g/l/(7/24)
ω=√(24g/7l)
okay, I see what you mean.
For v, wouldn't you just plug in for ω?
1/2mv2+1/2(1/12ml22=mgl/4
m/2*v2=mgl/4-1/24ml^2*24g/7l=mgl/4-mgl/7
v2=(7gl-4gl)/14=3gl/14
v=√(3gl/14)
 
natasha13100 said:
For v, wouldn't you just plug in for ω?

yes :smile:

(but in your last post you used the wrong distance … the question asks for v for the bottom of the rod, which is not the same v as you used earlier)
1/2mv2+1/2(1/12ml22=mgl/4
m/2*v2=mgl/4-1/24ml^2*24g/7l=mgl/4-mgl/7
v2=(7gl-4gl)/14=3gl/14
v=√(3gl/14)

i'm confused … what is this? :confused:
 
Oh that was the v of the center of mass (I think). So for the bottom of the rod, r=3l/4 (distance from pivot to bottom of rod) and v=√(24g/7l)*3l/4
 
  • #10
yup! :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K