Unifourm Continuity of f(x)=1/x on (0,+∞)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ArixII
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(x) = 1/x is continuous on the interval (0, +∞) but is not uniformly continuous. The proof involves assuming uniform continuity and deriving a contradiction by selecting a fixed ε (epsilon) value, specifically ε = 1. By establishing that for any δ (delta) > 0, the difference |f(x) - f(a)| can exceed 1 as x approaches 0, it becomes evident that uniform continuity cannot hold in this case.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuity and uniform continuity in real analysis.
  • Familiarity with the ε-δ definition of limits.
  • Basic knowledge of function behavior as inputs approach boundaries (e.g., limits as x approaches 0).
  • Graphical interpretation of functions and their continuity properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the ε-δ definition of uniform continuity in detail.
  • Explore examples of functions that are continuous but not uniformly continuous.
  • Learn about the implications of continuity on function behavior near boundaries.
  • Investigate the concept of limits and their role in proving continuity properties.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, educators teaching continuity concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of function behavior in calculus.

ArixII
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,
in this forum post, exactly at #4:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=52795"

after a clarification for uniformly continuous function, it is written that:
"...For example, [tex]f(x)=\frac{1}{x}[/tex] is contiuous, but not uniformly continuous on the interval [tex](0,+\infty)[/tex]"

I failed to prove it :(

Could anyone please give me a clue, how to prove that this function is not uniformly continuous on the given interval?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ArixII said:
Hi,
in this forum post, exactly at #4:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=52795"

after a clarification for uniformly continuous function, it is written that:
"...For example, [tex]f(x)=\frac{1}{x}[/tex] is contiuous, but not uniformly continuous on the interval [tex](0,+\infty)[/tex]"

I failed to prove it :(

Could anyone please give me a clue, how to prove that this function is not uniformly continuous on the given interval?

Proof ideas/hints:
1. First suppose f is uniformly continuous in the interval. We now wish to obtain a contradiction.
2. Choose a fixed epsilon to deal with, say [tex]\epsilon = 1[/tex]. This shouldn't matter because as we can see from the graph the difference in function values grows beyond all bounds as we approach 0 (which is what we are going to prove).
3. We then, by uniform continuity, have: "there exists some [tex]\delta > 0[/tex] such that if [tex]a,x \in (0,\infty)[/tex] and [tex]0 < |a-x| < \delta[/tex] then [tex]|f(x)-f(a)| < 1[/tex]".
4. Considering the graph we see that as the gap between a and x becomes greater the difference in the function value becomes greater so we don't need to consider the case when they are close. Thus the proof will probably go through if we let a = x + delta/2. If it wouldn't go through then we could have been given delta/2 in the previous step and not being able to obtain a contradiction f would have been uniformly continuous. Since we know it isn't we can let [tex]a = x+\delta/2[/tex] and obtain a contradiction for some [tex]a \in (0,\infty)[/tex].
5. Now is it always true that [tex]0 < |a-x| < \delta[/tex] for positive x? If it is then it's always true that [tex]|f(x)-f(a)| < 1[/tex] for positive x.
6. Can you find some x expressed in terms of delta such that this leads to a contradiction? (You could for instance consider when equality occurs and then simply let x be that value).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
rasmhop said:
Proof ideas/hints:
1. First suppose f is uniformly continuous in the interval. We now wish to obtain a contradiction.
2. Choose a fixed epsilon to deal with, say [tex]\epsilon = 1[/tex]. This shouldn't matter because as we can see from the graph the difference in function values grows beyond all bounds as we approach 0 (which is what we are going to prove).
3. We then, by uniform continuity, have: "there exists some [tex]\delta > 0[/tex] such that if [tex]a,x \in (0,\infty)[/tex] and [tex]0 < |a-x| < \delta[/tex] then [tex]|f(x)-f(a)| < 1[/tex]".
4. Considering the graph we see that as the gap between a and x becomes greater the difference in the function value becomes greater so we don't need to consider the case when they are close. Thus the proof will probably go through if we let a = x + delta/2. If it wouldn't go through then we could have been given delta/2 in the previous step and not being able to obtain a contradiction f would have been uniformly continuous. Since we know it isn't we can let [tex]a = x+\delta/2[/tex] and obtain a contradiction for some [tex]a \in (0,\infty)[/tex].
5. Now is it always true that [tex]0 < |a-x| < \delta[/tex] for positive x? If it is then it's always true that [tex]|f(x)-f(a)| < 1[/tex] for positive x.
6. Can you find some x expressed in terms of delta such that this leads to a contradiction? (You could for instance consider when equality occurs and then simply let x be that value).

Thank you! Actually I didn't get a lot, but that the [tex]\epsilon = 1[/tex] helps as the function goes to infinity when x approaches zero. Puting [tex]a = x+\delta/2[/tex] I could not figure it out how this is useful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K