Uniqueness with Laplace's Equation and Robin Boundary Condn

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves Laplace's equation in a bounded region with Robin boundary conditions. The original poster is tasked with proving uniqueness of the solution under specific conditions related to a constant λ.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to demonstrate uniqueness for λ > 0 and has shown the additive inverse for λ = 0. They express uncertainty about the next steps after establishing a relationship using W = S - T.
  • Some participants suggest using a previously proven identity and substituting terms to analyze the signs of the resulting expressions.
  • Questions arise regarding the interpretation of the signs in the context of the identity and how to proceed from there.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

Participants note that additional information may be required to advance the discussion, indicating potential gaps in understanding or assumptions that need to be clarified.

JonoPUH
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that T(x, y) satisfies Laplace’s equation in a bounded region
D and that
∂T/∂n+ λT = σ(x, y) on ∂D,
where ∂D is the boundary of D, ∂T/∂n is the outward normal deriva-
tive of T, σ is a given function, and λ is a constant. Prove that there
is at most one solution to the problem if λ > 0, and that if λ = 0
the solution is not unique, but any two solutions differ by an additive
constant.


Homework Equations


Txx+Tyy=0


The Attempt at a Solution


I have managed to show the additive inverse part for λ=0, but I'm having trouble with the λ>0 part.

I used W=S-T, where S also satisfies the above conditions, so therefore W is also a solution of Laplace's, with
∂W/∂n+λW=0.
However, I don't know where to go from there.
Do I use the identity I used in the previous part, which gives me ∫∫RWx2+Wy2dxdy=∫∂RW(∂W/∂n)ds ?
Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm still really stuck on this. Is there any more information people require to help me?
Thanks.
 
The identity you proved in the previous part is exactly what you need. If you substitute -lambda*W for dW/dn in the right integral, compare the signs of each side of the equality
 
Thanks for the tip, but could you possibly explain what you mean by the sign of each side? Is it simply that one side is positive, and the other is negative? In which case, I'm not sure how to proceed. Sorry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K