Unit cell conversion and shape of fuel pellet

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of square unit cells into circular shapes for calculating the thermal utilization factor (f) in nuclear fuel pellets. It highlights the challenges of simulating lattice configurations with circular fuel and square moderators. The preference for cylindrical fuel pellets over rectangular prisms is attributed to their larger surface area, which enhances neutron interaction, and the mechanical difficulties associated with manufacturing square pellets. Additionally, the arrangement of fuel in various reactor types, such as VVER and Fast Reactor fuels, is noted for its impact on reactor design.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal utilization factor (f) in nuclear engineering
  • Knowledge of neutron behavior in different fuel shapes
  • Familiarity with lattice configurations in reactor design
  • Basic principles of fuel pellet manufacturing processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of surface area on neutron interaction in nuclear fuel
  • Explore the manufacturing processes for cylindrical versus rectangular fuel pellets
  • Study the design and arrangement of VVER and Fast Reactor fuel assemblies
  • Learn about the simulation techniques for modeling fuel and moderator interactions
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, reactor designers, and researchers focused on fuel pellet optimization and reactor performance analysis will benefit from this discussion.

oksuz_
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
As you may know, below is the conversion process of square unit cell into circular shape in order to calculate the thermal utilization factor (f) for a lattice.

unit cell.png


As far as I know, it is really difficult to make a simulation for which a lattice is constructed as a circular fuel and square moderator in shape or the other way around.

My question is why fuel pellets are not manufactured as rectangular prism. Is there some kind of drawback?

Thank you in advance.
 

Attachments

  • unit cell.png
    unit cell.png
    12.5 KB · Views: 909
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello,

In my opinion, the shape of fuel pellets has to do mainly with the combustion process.

What do you think?
 
For the same volume of cylindrical and cubic pellets, the surface area is bigger for cylindrical shape. So, neutrons see more fuel in that design but I am not sure tough.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DoItForYourself
I agree, the surface area is bigger in the case of cylindrical pellets. The surface area of the solid plays an important role in reaction's rate.

However, I do not know whether the manufacturing of cubic pellets is more difficult than the manufacturing of cylindrical ones.
 
DoItForYourself said:
However, I do not know whether the manufacturing of cubic pellets is more difficult than the manufacturing of cylindrical ones.
Mechanically, it would be a disadvantage to manufacture square pellets, and similarly, square tubes would produce high stresses in the corners. The fuel rods of LWR fuel can develop relatively high internal gas pressure.
oksuz_ said:
As far as I know, it is really difficult to make a simulation for which a lattice is constructed as a circular fuel and square moderator in shape or the other way around.
The square moderator simply reflects the square or rectilinear array in which cylindrical fuel rods are arranged. VVER fuel and Fast Reactor fuel are arranged in hexagonal arrays, or triangular lattices.

Some gas-cooled graphite moderated reactors used fuel dispersed in hexagonal fuel blocks with cylindrical cooling channels, while pebble bed reactors use spherical fuel elements that do not necessarily have a regular array.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K