Unit Conversions: kJ/mol to kJ/litre

  • Thread starter Thread starter clintyip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Unit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on converting energy from kJ/mol to kJ/L for a substance with a molar mass of 86.14 g/mol and a density of 0.6548 g/mL. The conversion process involves multiplying the energy value by the conversion factor of 1 mol/86.14 g, followed by multiplying by the density to obtain kJ/mL. The final conversion to kJ/L is achieved by multiplying the result by 1000, yielding a value of 31645.4 kJ/L. However, this value is inconsistent with the known heat of combustion for Hexane, which is 29.3 kJ/L, suggesting a potential misunderstanding in unit interpretation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of molar mass and its significance in conversions
  • Knowledge of density and its units (g/mL)
  • Familiarity with unit conversion techniques
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics related to energy measurements
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and energy content of Hexane
  • Learn about unit conversions in thermodynamics, specifically for energy
  • Explore the significance of density in calculating energy per volume
  • Investigate common discrepancies in energy values from different sources
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, chemical engineers, and students studying thermodynamics or energy conversions will benefit from this discussion, particularly those working with energy measurements in chemical substances.

clintyip
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Let's say I have 4163 kJ/mol of energy coming from a substance with molar mass 86.14g/mol. How would I convert the 4163 kJ/mol of energy to kJ/litre?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
clintyip said:
Let's say I have 4163 kJ/mol of energy coming from a substance with molar mass 86.14g/mol. How would I convert the 4163 kJ/mol of energy to kJ/litre?

Thanks.

You'll need to also know the density (g/L) of the substance.
 
gneill said:
You'll need to also know the density (g/L) of the substance.

The density of this substance is 0.6548 g/mL.
 
your answer wants kJ on top, so you start with 4163 kJ/mol .
You multiply by a number that has moles on top , so they cancel.
but now there's something else on the bottom,
so you multiply by a number that has grams on top . then you're done.
 
But I don't have a number with mols on top o_o
 
Conversion factor

\frac {86.14 g} {1 mol}

can be reversed to

\frac {1 mol} {86.14 g}

The idea is that conversion factor equals 1, switching nominator and denominator doesn't change the value, although it moves units.
 
Borek said:
Conversion factor

\frac {86.14 g} {1 mol}

can be reversed to

\frac {1 mol} {86.14 g}

The idea is that conversion factor equals 1, switching nominator and denominator doesn't change the value, although it moves units.

That means, I can multiply 4163kj/mol by 1/86.14g, which then I get 4163kJ/86.14g.
Then I multiply this number by the density. So 4163kJ/86.14g x 0.6578g/mL
which equals to 31.64 kJ/mL

Is that right?
 
clintyip said:
I can multiply 4163kj/mol by 1/86.14g, which then I get 4163kJ/86.14g.

To be precise by 1 mol/86.14g, but I guess it is just a typo.

Then I multiply this number by the density. So 4163kJ/86.14g x 0.6578g/mL
which equals to 31.64 kJ/mL

Is that right?

OK so far, but you are not there yet - you need to convert it to kJ/L. But that's the simplest part.
 
Borek said:
To be precise by 1 mol/86.14g, but I guess it is just a typo.



OK so far, but you are not there yet - you need to convert it to kJ/L. But that's the simplest part.

Don't I just multiply it by 1000? So I get 31645.4 kJ/L.

But the thing is, this substance is Hexane, and according to Wikipedia, it has a heat of combustion of 29.3 kJ/L. The two numbers aren't even remotely close.
 
  • #10
clintyip said:
Don't I just multiply it by 1000? So I get 31645.4 kJ/L.

Yes.

But the thing is, this substance is Hexane, and according to Wikipedia, it has a heat of combustion of 29.3 kJ/L. The two numbers aren't even remotely close.

Obviously what they mean is MJ/L, otherwise their numbers are not consistent. As much as I like wikipedia, it is hardly a definite source.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K