Unit Normal to a level surface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the unit normal to the level surface defined by the equation $$\phi = x^{2} + y^{2} - z^{2} - 1$$ at the point r = (0,1,0). The correct unit normal is derived using the gradient method, yielding $$\hat{\mathbf n} = \hat{\mathbf j}$$. The user encountered an issue with indeterminate values when evaluating partial derivatives at this point, specifically $$\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}$$, which resulted in division by zero. The consensus is that the vertical tangent plane at this point does not invalidate the normal vector calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gradient vectors and their applications in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with level surfaces and their properties
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their computation
  • Proficiency in using mathematical notation and equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of gradient vectors in multivariable calculus
  • Explore the concept of level surfaces and their geometric interpretations
  • Learn about handling indeterminate forms in calculus, particularly in partial derivatives
  • Investigate the implications of vertical tangent planes on surface normals
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with multivariable calculus, particularly in the context of surface analysis and normal vector calculations.

CRD_98
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given $$\phi = x^{2} +y^{2}-z^{2}-1 $$

Calculate the unit normal to level surface φ = 0 at the point r = (0,1,0)

Homework Equations


  1. $$ \hat{\mathbf n} = \frac{∇\phi}{|\phi|}$$
  2. $$ z = \sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2} -1} $$
  3. $$ \mathbf n = (1,0,(\frac{\partial z}{\partial x})_{P}) \times (0,1,(\frac{\partial z}{\partial y})_{P}) $$

The Attempt at a Solution



Using equation (1) above I obtained:
$$\hat{\mathbf n} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^{2} + y^{2} +z^{2}}} (x\hat{\mathbf i}, y\hat{\mathbf j}, -z\hat{\mathbf k})$$

Evaluating this at (0,1,0) resulted in $$\hat{\mathbf n} = \hat{\mathbf j}$$

As far I can tell this is correct? I ran into a problem when I tried using equations (2) and (3) to check my answer;
I worked out the partial derivatives as follows:

$$\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} = \frac{x}{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}-1}} $$
$$\frac{\partial z}{\partial y} = \frac{y}{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}-1}} $$

Evaluating these partial derivatives at (0,1,0) gave:

$$(\frac{\partial z}{\partial x})_{P} = 0 $$

$$(\frac{\partial z}{\partial y})_{P} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1^{2}-1}} = \frac{1}{0} $$

My problem is that I am getting an indeterminate value for the partial derivative w.r.t y evaluated at (0,1,0). I'm struggling to see where I have gone wrong, if anyone could help point out my mistake it would be greatly appreciated :)

I have also attached a wolfram alpha screenshot in relation to my second attempt's method, does this second method only work for some scalars?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-05-06 at 20.53.20.png
    Screen Shot 2018-05-06 at 20.53.20.png
    6 KB · Views: 537
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's best to use the formula ##\nabla \phi = \langle \phi_x,\phi_y, \phi_z \rangle##. Your answer is correct. The problem is probably that the surface has a vertical tangent plane at the point whose normal is in the y direction. z isn't a function of x and y at that point, but the surface still has a unit normal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CRD_98
LCKurtz said:
It's best to use the formula ##\nabla \phi = \langle \phi_x,\phi_y, \phi_z \rangle##. Your answer is correct. The problem is probably that the surface has a vertical tangent plane at the point whose normal is in the y direction. z isn't a function of x and y at that point, but the surface still has a unit normal.

Ah okay thank you for that, I'll stick to the grad method
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K