Unit Vectors for Ellipse: How Do You Find the Tangential and Normal Vectors?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the tangential and normal unit vectors for an ellipse defined by its major axis length 'a' in the x-direction and minor axis length 'b' in the y-direction. The parameterization of the ellipse is expressed as vec{r}(t) = x(t)hat{i} + y(t)hat{j} + z(t)hat{k}, with the tangent vector hat{T} = \frac{-a\sin{\theta}hat{i} + b\cos{\theta}hat{j}}{\sqrt{a^{2}\sin^{2}{\theta} + b^{2}\cos^{2}{\theta}}} and the normal vector hat{N} = \frac{b\cos{\theta}hat{i} + a\sin{\theta}hat{j}}{\sqrt{a^{2}\sin^{2}{\theta} + b^{2}\cos^{2}{\theta}}}. It is confirmed that hat{N} is orthogonal to hat{T}, and the distinction between outward and inward normals is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric equations for curves
  • Familiarity with calculus concepts, specifically derivatives
  • Knowledge of unit vectors and their properties
  • Basic understanding of ellipses and their geometric properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of unit vectors for different conic sections
  • Learn about the application of parametric equations in physics
  • Explore the use of Mathematica for symbolic differentiation
  • Investigate the differences between inward and outward normal vectors in vector calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, geometry enthusiasts, and anyone involved in physics or engineering requiring a solid understanding of vector analysis related to ellipses.

psid
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the tangential and normal unit vectors for an ellipse with major axis of length a in the x-direction and minor axis of length b in the y-direction.

Homework Equations



For a circle, the unit vectors are defined as
\hat{r}=\cos{\theta}\hat{i}+\sin{\theta}\hat{j}
\hat{\theta}=-\sin{\theta}\hat{i}+\cos{\theta}\hat{j}

The Attempt at a Solution



For the circular case the derivation is easy, one just takes the derivate of
\vec{r}=r\cos{\theta}\hat{i}+r\sin{\theta}\hat{j}
with respect to \theta and r. Now one can take the derivative with respect to \theta and hope that this gives the vector I'm looking for, but I'm not sure. How about the vector normal to the tangent?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why did you not use the appropriate form for homework problems? In particular, why have you not shown any attempt to do this yourself?

(In order that anyone be able to do this, you will need to specify the directions for the major and minor axes.)
 
First step is to parameterize the ellipse into the form \vec{r}=\vec{r}(t)=x(t)\hat{i}+y(t)\hat{j}+z(t)\hat{k} (I used t as the parameter, but you could just as well use \theta or any other variable). For example, a circle in the xy-plane of radius R centered at the origin can be parameterized as \vec{r}(t)=R\cos(t)\hat{i}+R\sin(t)\hat{j}.

Once you've parameterized your ellipse, the unit tangent \hat{T} and unit normal \hat{N} can be easily found by taking derivatives with respect to your chosen parameter:

\hat{T}=\frac{\vec{v}}{v}=\frac{\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}}{\left| \frac{d\vec{r}}{dt} \right|}

\hat{N}=\frac{\frac{d\hat{T}}{dt}}{\left| \frac{d\hat{T}}{dt} \right|}

You should have similar definitions for these unit vectors given in whatever calculus text you are using...do you not?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply. The above expression yields tangent vector rather easily:

\hat{T}=\frac{-a\sin{\theta}\hat{i}+b\cos{\theta}\hat{j}}{\sqrt{a^{2}\sin^{2}{\theta}+b^{2}\cos^{2}{\theta}}}.<br />

But taking the derivative of this yields multiple pages of output in Mathemathica and is not very useful.

Looking the tangent vector one can see that vector defined as

\hat{N}=\frac{b\cos{\theta}\hat{i}+a\sin{\theta}\hat{j}}{\sqrt{a^{2}\sin^{2}{\theta}+b^{2}\cos^{2}{\theta}}}
should be orthogonal with \hat{T} for all \theta.

So perhaps this could be used as the normal vector. Am I correct?
 
That looks fine to me; just be sure that you are being asked for the outward normal, and not the inward normal (Your problem statement doesn't say what definition you are using for the unit normal) which differs from your result by a negative sign.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K