Unitary Matrix Property: |Uij|2 = UijU*ji

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of unitary matrices, specifically the relationship between the elements of a unitary matrix and their complex conjugates. Participants explore the validity of the equation |Uij|² = UijU*ji and its implications in the context of matrix operations and transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the property of unitary matrices that leads to the equation UijU*ji = |Uij|².
  • Another participant asserts that the relationship holds for any matrix, referencing the definition of the conjugate transpose.
  • A participant clarifies that U*ji represents the complex conjugate of Uij, but questions if the initial claim remains valid under this interpretation.
  • One participant provides a counterexample using a rotation matrix, arguing that the equation does not hold for certain values of sin(t).
  • A participant discusses a transformation involving a Hermitian conjugate and seeks clarification on a perceived mistake in their understanding of matrix multiplication.
  • Another participant identifies the mistake in the transformation process, emphasizing the correct application of matrix multiplication rules.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the equation involving unitary matrices, with some asserting it is a general property while others provide counterexamples. The discussion regarding the Hermitian conjugate also reveals a misunderstanding that is clarified, indicating some level of agreement on the correction.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved assumptions about the properties of unitary matrices and the definitions used in matrix operations. The counterexample provided raises questions about the conditions under which the initial claim holds true.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi guys

I have been sitting here for a while thinking of why it is that for a unitary matrix U we have that UijU*ji = |Uij|2. What property of unitary matrices is it that gives U this property?


Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is true of any matrix: [tex]U^*=\overline{U}^T[/tex]. So [tex]U^*_{ji}=\overline{U_{ij}}[/tex]. And of course, for any complex number z, we have [itex]z\overline{z}=|z|^2[/itex]
 
By an asterix I meant complex conjugation, so [tex] (U^\dagger )_{ij} = (U_{ji})^*[/tex]. Is it still valid then?
 
Last edited:
It is not valid in this case. Take for example the rotation matrix

cos(t) -sin(t)
sin(t) cos(t)

It is orthogonal, hence unitary. But for any sin(t) different from 0, we have [itex]U_{12}U^*_{21}=-\sin^2(t)\neq |\sin(t)|^2=|U_{12}|^2[/itex].
 
Hmm, I have a problem then. I have a transformation

[tex] \mathbf{m} = S\mathbf{a},[/tex]

which has the components

[tex] m_i = \sum_j S_{ij}a_j.[/tex]

Now I want to find the Hermitian conjugate (I denote this by a dagger, and complex conjugation is denoted by an asterix), and we have

[tex] \mathbf{m}^\dagger = \mathbf{a}^\dagger S^\dagger,[/tex]

which has the components

[tex] m^\dagger_i &= \sum_j a_j^\dagger (S^\dagger)_{ij} \\<br /> &=\sum_j a_j^\dagger (S^*)_{ji}.[/tex]

My teacher says the last step is wrong, but I cannot see why. Can you help me spot the error?
 
Last edited:
Your mistake is when you say

[tex]m^\dagger_i &= \sum_j a_j^\dagger (S^\dagger)_{ij}[/tex]

According to the definition of matrix multiplication, correct is

[tex]m^\dagger_i &= \sum_j a_j^\dagger (S^\dagger)_{ji}[/tex]
 
Ahh, I see it now. Of course the column has to be fixed, not the row. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K