Loren Booda
- 3,108
- 4
Could our cosmos consist of only identical particles?
The discussion revolves around the concept of whether the universe could consist solely of indistinguishable particles, particularly focusing on the nature of fundamental particles and the role of photons in the cosmos. Participants explore theoretical implications, historical perspectives, and various models related to fundamental particles.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of fundamental particles or the validity of the idea that the universe could consist solely of indistinguishable particles. Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the role of photons and the implications of string theory.
Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of fundamental particles, and there are unresolved questions regarding the relationship between photons and other particles. The discussion reflects a variety of interpretations and theoretical frameworks without definitive conclusions.
This discussion may be of interest to those exploring theoretical physics, particularly concepts related to fundamental particles, cosmology, and string theory.
Loren Booda said:For instance, is it possible that photons are the fundamental particles? Please tell me briefly why if not.
Yes.phinds said:Are you asking is it possible that ALL particles are just combinations of photons?
Loren Booda said:Yes.
During the big bang, at extremely high temperatures, I interpreted that photons are the predominant particle, according to Roger Penrose in his "Road to Reality."
mjacobsca said:Many people are pursuing string theory as a solution to the fundamental particle. String theory suggests that absolutely everything is made up of vibrating bands of energy, called strings, and that these vibrations are responsible for all particles, such as photons, electrons, gluons, quarks, etc. Brian Green's The Elegant Universe talks about strings in depth, and is worth reading. Note, however, that String Theory is still undergoing development, not to mention wait for a viable means of testing, and is therefore relegated to academics only at this point.
OCR said: