University Physics by Young & Freedman - Self Study

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the suitability of the Young & Freedman physics text for self-study in preparation for a physics degree. Users express concerns about the text's basic nature, particularly in calculus-based physics, and the potential gap in knowledge when transitioning to university-level courses. Recommendations include reviewing optics and basic relativity, as well as consulting with professors for guidance. The text is noted for its use in MIT's freshman physics course, indicating its adequacy for foundational learning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically as it relates to physics concepts.
  • Familiarity with basic physics topics, including mechanics and electromagnetism (E&M).
  • Knowledge of optics and relativity for comprehensive preparation.
  • Experience with self-study techniques and resources, such as online course materials.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the syllabus and materials from MIT's Physics I course available at http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-01-physics-i-fall-2003/syllabus/.
  • Study optics and basic relativity to fill knowledge gaps before university.
  • Utilize online resources for practice exams and video lectures to reinforce learning.
  • Contact university professors or academic advisors for personalized guidance on course preparation.
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for a physics degree, self-learners in physics and calculus, and anyone seeking to strengthen their foundational knowledge before enrolling in university-level physics courses.

truman
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Am I being lulled by a basic text?

I am re-studying basic physics and calculus for a run at a physics degree. I am using the Stewart text for calculus and I find it challenging.

I am using the Young and Freedman physics text, and I find the calculus-based portions incredibly basic. I am afraid if I am not using a challenging enough text, I will be hit with a brick wall when I re-enroll at university.

Am I on the right course with this text?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you plan to start out in the intro mechanics class? What is your background?
 
xdrgnh said:
Do you plan to start out in the intro mechanics class? What is your background?

This. I think most schools start the core classes after calc based physics 2 (e&m / waves, opticks, motion).
 
I've only had calc based phyics, I&II. We did not do optics or relativity, just mechanics and some e&m, and motion.

I wanted to review those subjects, do optics and (basic) relativity, basically this whole text. I just don't want to get to a new school and instead of deriving a very basic formula, they're integrating some huge formula with CAS. I can figure that out, I just want to be prepared.
 
truman said:
I've only had calc based phyics, I&II. We did not do optics or relativity, just mechanics and some e&m, and motion.

I wanted to review those subjects, do optics and (basic) relativity, basically this whole text. I just don't want to get to a new school and instead of deriving a very basic formula, they're integrating some huge formula with CAS. I can figure that out, I just want to be prepared.

you'll be fine, email a professor or someone in the undergrad dept to be safe.
 
Most freshman physics texts are written with the expectation that students are taking calculus concurrently, i.e. they don't know much calculus the first few weeks. They start out very gently with the math, but it will ramp up.

If you go here
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-01-physics-i-fall-2003/syllabus/
you will see that Young and Freedman was used in the freshman physics class at MIT not very long ago. So assuming your school isn't a lot harder than MIT, you should be fine.

That site should also give you some good practice exams, and it also has video lectures (based on a different text, I think).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K