The Potential of Transgenic Mice Models for Virus Research

  • Thread starter Thread starter TytoAlba95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of transgenic mice models for studying poliovirus infection. Participants debate the necessity of expressing viral proteins in the mice, with one side arguing that the primary goal should be to create a model that can be infected, rather than complicating the model with additional viral protein expressions. The confusion arises from the inclusion of puberty in one of the options, which some believe may be irrelevant to the study's goals. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards focusing on the human receptor protein to facilitate viral docking and infection. The discussion highlights the importance of clarity in experimental design for effective virus research.
TytoAlba95
Messages
132
Reaction score
19
Homework Statement
While attempting to create a model of poliomyelitis in mice, it was found that the mice cannot be infected with the said virus. Since human beings are susceptible to this viral infection, which kind of transgenic mice should be generated to have a transgenic mouse model that can be infected with polio virus. Select the right approach from below:
Relevant Equations
a. A mouse expressing human receptor gene which makes cell surface protein for docking and internalization of polio virus.
b. A mouse expressing human receptor gene which makes cell surface protein for docking and internalization of polio virus along with a gene designed to express surface protein of this virus at puberty.

Ans:a
I think the answer should be (b) and not (a) because to study the mice model, there should be a gene designed to express the protein of this virus on the cell surface (but I don't know the what it has got to do with puberty ).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure what the problem is, a. and b. differ only by that puberty part - so why would you choose b over a?
 
Borek said:
Not sure what the problem is, a. and b. differ only by that puberty part - so why would you choose b over a?

Option b. is slightly different from a. , (b) talks about incorporating a gene (MHC class II,I guess) that will express the viral peptide after internalization and processing of the virus particle.

I don't understand what puberty has to do with this. May be the puberty part rules out option (b).
 
Perhaps you misquoted the question then, I fail to see a single letter by which these things differ:

a. A mouse expressing human receptor gene which makes cell surface protein for docking and internalization of polio virus

b. A mouse expressing human receptor gene which makes cell surface protein for docking and internalization of polio virus
 
Borek said:
Perhaps you misquoted the question then, I fail to see a single letter by which these things differ:
I don't know why it is not displaying correctly to you.
I quoted the following two options:

a. A mouse expressing human receptor gene which makes cell surface protein for docking and internalization of polio virus.
b. A mouse expressing human receptor gene which makes cell surface protein for docking and internalization of polio virus along with a gene designed to express surface protein of this virus at puberty.
 
The key part to the question is this:
SanjuktaGhosh said:
which kind of transgenic mice should be generated to have a transgenic mouse model that can be infected (my emphasis) with polio virus.
If you’re trying to build an animal model of infection, do you want the mouse to express the viral protein?
 
TeethWhitener said:
If you’re trying to build an animal model of infection, do you want the mouse to express the viral protein?

Yes, I would like the viral protein to be expressed to study how the animal's immunity handle's the infection(which I believe would be the aim of building the model).
 
Here’s how I’m reading the question: you want to build a mouse model that can be infected with the poliovirus. It’s clear that you will want to express the human receptor protein on the mouse cells’ surface, so that when the virus is introduced, it will be able to dock with and infect the model organism’s cells. If the mouse is also expressing viral surface protein, what advantage does that give you for reaching your goal? I’m assuming you aren’t interested in immune response yet, you’re just interested in seeing if the cell can be infected with the virus. Having a viral protein that’s expressed both by the virus and by the model organism is only going to confuse things.
 
TeethWhitener said:
Here’s how I’m reading the question: you want to build a mouse model that can be infected with the poliovirus. It’s clear that you will want to express the human receptor protein on the mouse cells’ surface, so that when the virus is introduced, it will be able to dock with and infect the model organism’s cells. If the mouse is also expressing viral surface protein, what advantage does that give you for reaching your goal? I’m assuming you aren’t interested in immune response yet, you’re just interested in seeing if the cell can be infected with the virus. Having a viral protein that’s expressed both by the virus and by the model organism is only going to confuse things.

I see your point. Thank you.
 
Back
Top