Unpacking the Implication of a Formula: n=2

[bubblewrap]

Edited by moderator

In the attached file it says that the formula for when n=2 implies the next one but I don't understand why it suddenly became (s-t0)^2 inside the integral instead of (s-t0) in the next one and keeps this pattern, it doesn't seem to be implied anywhere for me.

 

[Mark44]

@bubblewrap,
Your first image was posted sideways, so I deleted it, and edited your post accordingly. Many members will not bother responding if an image is of poor quality or upside-down or sideways.

Please start a new thread with your question about the first image, and try to post the image so that it is oriented correctly.

 

[Erland]

You get the second step in the inequality you ask about if you integrate the LHS and RHS of the previous inequality.

 

[bubblewrap]

You get the second step in the inequality you ask about if you integrate the LHS and RHS of the previous inequality.

Thank you!